Trump's Chief of Staff Appointment Sparks Outrage Among Democrats
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
President Donald Trump appointed his close advisor Stephen Miller as White House Chief of Staff, drawing sharp criticism from Democrats who called him dangerous and a xenophobe. The appointment followed Trump's significant midterm election losses. While Democrats like Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer condemned the move, some Republicans and White House officials praised Miller as a loyal supporter of Trump's agenda. Miller has been a key figure in shaping Trump's immigration policies and has a hawkish stance on issues related to Israel.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Stephen Miller, a close advisor to President Trump, was appointed White House Chief of Staff.
- Democrats harshly criticized the appointment, calling Miller dangerous and a xenophobe.
- Hakeem Jeffries compared Miller to a "malignant tumor" and called for his removal.
- The appointment followed President Trump's significant midterm election losses.
- Some Republican allies and White House officials praised Miller's loyalty to Trump's agenda.
- Miller has been influential in shaping Trump's immigration policies and has a hawkish stance on Israel.
Democratic lawmakers harshly criticized the appointment of Stephen Miller, President Donald Trump's closest advisor, as the new White House Chief of Staff. Miller, described as the architect of mass deportations and labeled a "hater of foreigners" and "dangerous," drew comparisons to a "malignant tumor" by senior Democrat Hakeem Jeffries, who called for his removal. The announcement of Miller's promotion, following Trump's significant midterm election losses where his party lost control of both houses of Congress, surprised many.
Jeffries stated that Miller is a "dangerous and extremist irresponsible xenophobe, on whose hands is American blood," and that his presence in the administration must be "uprooted like a malignant tumor." Other Democrats echoed this sentiment. Senator Dick Durbin called Miller a "purveyor of hate" and stated that Trump "has learned nothing." Chuck Schumer, expected to become Senate Majority Leader, called Miller's promotion a "terrible decision" and proof that Trump "has learned nothing from his historic defeat."
Chris Van Hollen, a critic of Israel in the Senate, described the move as "another kick in the teeth to the American people" and "evidence of the contempt Trump has for the voters." Miller, 41, has been a loyal advisor to Trump since his 2016 campaign, shaping his immigration policies and translating his rhetoric into government action. While many in the first administration departed, Miller's influence grew, leading to his current promotion.
Former California Governor Gavin Newsom called Miller "one of the most despicable thugs" and an "insult to every American who voted for change." However, Trump allies and Republicans welcomed the news. White House Communications Director Steve Chung called Miller a "Trump OG" and "no more ardent supporter of Trump's agenda." Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also praised Miller.
Some Republicans also voiced criticism. Miles Taylor, former Chief of Staff at the Department of Homeland Security, called Miller's appointment "one of the most dangerous personnel decisions in the history of our Republic." Republican Congressman Marilyn Stutzman deemed it a "terrible decision." The White House defended Miller, calling him a "key player" who led the administration's fight against crime, promoted deregulation, unleashed American energy, dismantled drug cartels, and secured the border.
Regarding Israel, Miller is known for his hawkish stance, supporting U.S.-Israeli strikes in Iran and opposing pro-Palestinian activists on campuses. Testimony suggests he was involved in discussions about revoking visas and deporting foreign pro-Palestinian students for their political activities, a move that also drew criticism from Jewish organizations concerned about free speech.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Left 1Centre 1Right 1Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
