Lieberman's About-Face on Haredi Parties Exposes Political Hypocrisy
Translated & summarized from Kipa by baba
Avigdor Lieberman, chairman of Yisrael Beiteinu, has reversed his long-standing refusal to form coalitions with Haredi parties, potentially ending years of political instability. His shift is criticized as hypocritical by the author, who argues it suggests previous election cycles were unnecessary. The "Change Bloc" is also accused of similar political maneuvering regarding Haredi conscription, potentially damaging their future electoral prospects.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Avigdor Lieberman reversed his seven-year stance against forming coalitions with Haredi parties.
- Lieberman's change of heart suggests previous election cycles were unnecessary.
- The "Change Bloc" is accused of hypocrisy regarding Haredi conscription.
- The author questions the sincerity of the Haredi conscription issue as a political tool.
- Lieberman is urged to explain his past actions leading to political deadlock.
Avigdor Lieberman, chairman of the Yisrael Beiteinu party, has seemingly abandoned his long-held stance against forming coalitions with Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) parties. For seven years, Lieberman positioned himself as a staunch opponent of the Haredim, making their exclusion a central tenet of his political platform and a key reason for multiple election cycles. His refusal to sit with them was a prominent issue that contributed to Israel's political instability, including five elections, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the events of October 7th.
However, on Thursday, Lieberman appeared to signal a willingness to negotiate with Haredi parties to form a government, a move the article's author describes as undermining his previous principles and suggesting that the preceding years of political turmoil were unnecessary. This shift is compared to Naftali Bennett's 2021 coalition formation, where Bennett also compromised on campaign promises to establish a government.
The article criticizes not only Lieberman but also the broader "Change Bloc" (Gush Ha'shinu'i), which previously advocated for Haredi conscription into the IDF and criticized their exemption from military service. Now, the author suggests, this bloc is ready to form a government with the very Haredi parties they once opposed on this issue, questioning whether Haredi enlistment was ever a genuine national priority or merely a political tool.
The author posits that this perceived hypocrisy could cost the "Change Bloc" in future elections, as their core message of changing the relationship with Haredi parties will be undermined. Lieberman, in particular, is called upon to explain why he led the country through years of political deadlock over the Haredi issue if compromise was always possible.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 3Right 3Haredi 3Arab 2Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
