Referees' Association Admits Critical Errors in Bnei Yehuda's Cup Loss
Translated & summarized from N12 by baba
The Israeli Referees' Association admitted that referee Aviad Shiloh made three critical errors that harmed Bnei Yehuda in their State Cup match against MS Ashdod. Chairman Ziv Adler confirmed the mistakes, including a decisive, wrongly awarded penalty to Ashdod. Bnei Yehuda welcomed the acknowledgment but questioned accountability and future prevention, feeling the errors led to their cup exit.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Referees' Association admits referee made 3 critical errors against Bnei Yehuda.
- A wrongly awarded penalty to MS Ashdod in the 121st minute is cited as match-deciding.
- Bnei Yehuda claims the referee's mistakes led to their elimination from the State Cup.
- The association rejected Bnei Yehuda's request to ban the referee from their future games.
- Bnei Yehuda questioned accountability and measures to prevent future officiating errors.
The Israeli Referees' Association has acknowledged that referee Aviad Shiloh made three critical errors that disadvantaged Bnei Yehuda during their State Cup match against MS Ashdod. The club had filed a complaint following the game, and the association's chairman of the national refereeing committee, Ziv Adler, confirmed the mistakes in a letter to Bnei Yehuda CEO Oshri Dadai. These errors included a wrongly awarded penalty to Ashdod in the 121st minute, which Bnei Yehuda claims decided the match. The committee stated that the hand ball which led to the penalty did not warrant a call, as the player's hand was close to his body.
Adler's letter detailed other significant misjudgments. In the 64th minute, a penalty should have been awarded to Bnei Yehuda for a foul by an Ashdod defender. Additionally, an Ashdod player should have received a second yellow card in the 111th minute, and another Bnei Yehuda player, number 77, should have been sent off with a second yellow in the 96th minute.
The association did not hold back its criticism of Shiloh's performance, stating they were "unsatisfied, to say the least." His errors were reflected in his review score. However, the committee firmly rejected any suggestions of bias, emphasizing that these were purely professional mistakes. They also denied Bnei Yehuda's request to prevent Shiloh from officiating their future matches, stating that referees are not disqualified based on professional claims.
Bnei Yehuda responded by welcoming the referees' association's acknowledgment of the errors but expressed their deep disappointment, believing the mistakes led to their elimination from the cup. The club questioned who would be held accountable and what steps would be taken to prevent recurrence, stating that while admitting fault is important, true responsibility is measured by subsequent actions.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.