Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

MaarivPolitics

Law Enforcement's Selective Enforcement Threatens Israeli Democracy

Translated & summarized from Maariv by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

Dr. Eitan Lassry claims Israel's legal system practices selective enforcement, being aggressive towards the right but lenient with alleged corruption and election fraud in the Arab sector. He cites disputes between the Shin Bet chief and the Attorney General over election fraud investigations, contrasting it with the "Force 100" case. Lassry points to evidence of "ballot terrorism" with potential foreign funding, urging an independent investigation to restore public trust and uphold democratic principles.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Dr. Eitan Lassry alleges Israel's legal system selectively enforces the law, harshly against the right and leniently against Arab sector corruption.
  • A dispute between the Shin Bet chief and Attorney General concerns investigations into alleged foreign interference and illegal election funding.
  • The "Force 100" case is cited as an example of aggressive legal action, contrasted with perceived leniency in election fraud probes.
  • Evidence of "ballot terrorism," including cash envelopes and voter lists, suggests potential foreign funding impacting elections.
  • Lassry calls for an independent investigation team and international financial probes to address election fraud concerns.

An op-ed by Dr. Eitan Lassry argues that Israel's legal system exhibits a pattern of selective enforcement, applying harsh measures against the right while showing leniency towards suspicions of corruption and election fraud within the Arab sector. This alleged bias, facilitated by legal officials, is seen as undermining national sovereignty and democratic foundations.

Lassry draws parallels between the handling of the former Air Force commander's case and the current election fraud allegations. In both instances, he claims the legal system has avoided deep investigation, prioritized damage control, and obstructed transparency. He cites reports of a severe dispute between Shin Bet chief David Zini and Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara over the investigation into alleged foreign interference and illegal election funding among Arab political parties. While acknowledging the principle of requiring solid evidence before investigating public officials, Lassry contends this should not become a bureaucratic tool to block legitimate security and criminal probes.

The article highlights the "Force 100" case as an example of what Lassry describes as an unprecedented legal and media assault based on false claims and biased leaks, which he believes harmed soldiers' morale and Israel's international standing. He contrasts the aggressive investigation of "Force 100" soldiers and advisors to the Prime Minister with the perceived hesitancy and excessive caution in investigating alleged election fraud, suggesting a politically motivated approach to investigations.

Regarding the election fraud allegations, termed "ballot terrorism," Lassry points to physical evidence seized in the Negev, including cash envelopes and voter lists linked to the Ra'am party and the Islamic Movement. He expresses concern that these funds may have foreign backing, such as from Qatar or Turkey, escalating the issue from criminal offenses to a direct threat to national sovereignty. He questions the route of foreign funds, their connection to Arab politicians, and their potential impact on election outcomes.

Lassry calls for immediate, transparent, and uncompromising measures to restore public trust. These include establishing an independent investigation team with broad powers, conducting international financial investigations into the flow of foreign funds, and warning all Knesset members or public officials with intelligence or evidentiary information without political bias. He also demands transparency in legal decisions to delay investigations and preparedness for election appeals if fraud is proven. Lassry concludes that a state that ignores election fraud and foreign interference loses its right to be called a "rule of law democracy."

MaarivCentre · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Related stories · 1

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the Wire