Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Today

Wikipedia Bias Against Israel Persists, New ADL Study Finds

6 developments

i24NEWSWorld

Wikipedia's Anti-Israel Bias Persists Despite Editor Bans, New Report Finds

Translated & summarized from i24NEWS by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · 5 newsrooms covering

A new report by the Anti-Defamation League found that Wikipedia continues to exhibit significant bias against Israel, Hamas, and the October 7th events, with 19 active accounts shaping content through subtle editing methods. Despite previous bans on editors involved in a disinformation campaign, much of the biased content remains uncorrected on widely viewed pages. The ADL's CEO stated that Wikipedia must rectify its record, as these distortions influence AI and search results. The report provides examples of biased framing on pages like "Hamas," "Gaza War," and "Zionism," and recommends stricter editorial oversight and identity verification.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Wikipedia's content on Israel, Hamas, and October 7th remains biased despite editor bans, according to an ADL report.
  • 19 active accounts continue to shape sensitive topics on Wikipedia using subtle, undetected editing methods.
  • Biased content on Wikipedia influences AI systems and search engine results, impacting global information access.
  • Key articles like "Hamas," "Gaza War," and "Zionism" show examples of biased framing and removed evidence.
  • The ADL recommends identity verification for editors and systematic content reviews to combat bias on Wikipedia.

A new study by the Anti-Defamation League's Center for Technology and Society reveals that significant biases against Israel, Hamas, and the October 7th events remain on Wikipedia, even after editors involved in a coordinated disinformation campaign were banned. The report, published Thursday, indicates that 19 active accounts continue to shape content on these sensitive topics, employing subtler methods like reverting other editors' changes and gradually altering articles to avoid detection.

While overt coordinated activity has decreased by approximately 95% following congressional and federal scrutiny, a new group of editors has allegedly taken over the biased editing. The ADL's research highlights that work by banned editors has largely gone unexamined and uncorrected. These persistent distortions on widely viewed pages can influence AI systems, large language models, and search engine results, impacting how millions access information.

Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the ADL, stated that banning individual editors is insufficient, as key pages still bear the marks of a systematic disinformation campaign that Wikipedia itself has acknowledged but not rectified. He urged the online encyclopedia to correct its record, emphasizing its neutrality claims.

The report provides specific examples of biased editing, including the "Hamas" entry, where information on antisemitism and human rights violations was moved to a less visible page. The "Gaza War" entry had extensive details about forensic evidence from October 7th, including sexual violence and war crimes, removed and replaced with a single line stating that terrorists were "reportedly" involved. The "Zionism" entry presents controversial claims as facts, such as defining it as a movement that achieved its goals through "colonization" and that Zionists sought a state with "as few Palestinian Arabs as possible."

Further examples include the framing of sexual violence on October 7th as occurring only "according to reports," despite multiple confirming reports, and continued biased editing on the page concerning the Bibas family, even after their deaths in captivity were confirmed by Israeli forensic authorities. The ADL recommends measures such as identity verification for editors on controversial topics, content disputes being decided by expertise rather than internal struggles, and the establishment of a dedicated team to combat antisemitic bias. The report also calls for systematic content reviews of heavily edited pages by banned editors and urges search engines and AI developers to disclose when Wikipedia is used as a source.

i24NEWSCentre · Jaffa

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

WorldTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire