Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

N12Economy

Israeli Court Approves Class Action Against Apple Importer Over Used Parts

Translated & summarized from N12 by baba

CenterNeutral tone

Hebrew · Sole source

A class-action lawsuit has been approved against Apple's Israeli importers, Icon and iDigital, for allegedly keeping replaced customer parts and profiting from them. The lawsuit estimates damages at NIS 241 million and covers repairs of AirPods and MacBooks. The court found potential violations of consumer protection laws, while the companies called the claims theoretical and detached from reality.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • A class-action lawsuit against Apple's Israeli importers, Icon and iDigital, has been approved by a district court.
  • The lawsuit alleges the companies keep replaced customer parts and profit from them, with estimated damages of NIS 241 million.
  • The case covers repairs of AirPods and MacBooks after their warranties expired.
  • The court found potential violations of consumer protection regulations and a prior agreement.
  • The companies claim the approved allegations are theoretical and disconnected from consumer reality.

A district court in central Israel has approved a class-action lawsuit against Icon and its subsidiary iDigital, the official importers of Apple products in Israel. The lawsuit, filed by Aviel Avni and represented by attorney Ben Zion Citrin, alleges that the companies retain replaced parts from customer repairs without compensation, subsequently profiting from them by returning them to Apple globally.

The estimated damages in the lawsuit amount to NIS 241 million. Avni claims that when customers pay for new parts, such as for AirPods charging cases or MacBook screens, the old parts are kept by the repair centers and are not returned to the customer. He asserts that these retained parts are then refurbished by Apple and put back into circulation, generating revenue for the companies.

Judge Carmit Ben Eliezer ruled that there is a possibility the companies violated consumer protection regulations and a 2023 agreement with the Consumer Council. This agreement stipulated that customers should retain their replaced parts unless they explicitly waive this right in writing. The judge noted that Icon failed to present any form of waiver signed by a customer.

The lawsuit covers customers who had AirPods or MacBooks repaired by the companies after their warranty expired, within the seven years preceding the lawsuit's filing and up to the final verdict. The plaintiff estimates that individual customers lost approximately NIS 500 for replaced MacBook screens and NIS 100-150 for AirPods charging cases.

Icon and iDigital responded that they are reviewing the court's decision, which they claim dismissed most of the lawsuit's claims and criticized the plaintiff's conduct. They stated that the approved claims are theoretical and detached from consumer reality, asserting that the decision is preliminary and does not establish any damages.

N12Centre · Neve Ilan

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

EconomyTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 2 outlets
First: N12 · 3h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Only N12 so far.

Open the Wire