Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Today

Eisenkot Vows to Dismantle Hamas Rule Within 18 Months

18 developments

Now 14Politics

Likud Mocks Eisenkot's Hamas Destruction Plan, Cites Potential Partners

Translated & summarized from Now 14 by baba

RightCharged tone

Hebrew · Sole source

Gadi Eisenkot, chairman of the "Yashar!" party, vowed to dismantle Hamas rule in Gaza within 18 months. The Likud party sarcastically questioned his ability to gain approval from potential coalition partners for this plan. Ofer Winter's "Am Israel" party harshly criticized Eisenkot, blaming him for the "conception" leading to October 7th and asserting his government could not achieve a decisive outcome. The "Yashar!" party retorted that the Likud had strengthened Hamas over 17 years.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Gadi Eisenkot pledged to dismantle Hamas rule in Gaza within 18 months.
  • The Likud party questioned Eisenkot's ability to get approval from partners like Mansour and Tibi.
  • Ofer Winter's "Am Israel" party blamed Eisenkot for the "conception" leading to October 7th.
  • The "Am Israel" party contrasted Eisenkot's approach with their own plan for Gazan emigration.
  • The "Yashar!" party accused the Likud of misleading Israelis and strengthening Hamas for 17 years.

Gadi Eisenkot, chairman of the "Yashar!" party and former IDF Chief of Staff, declared his intention to dismantle Hamas rule in Gaza within 18 months. This announcement, made near the Gaza border, drew sharp criticism from the Likud party and Ofer Winter's "Am Israel" party.

The Likud party sarcastically questioned Eisenkot's ability to achieve his goal, asking, "Will you get approval from your partners Mansour and Tibi?" The Likud suggested that any future coalition led by Eisenkot would be constrained by political considerations from various partners, hindering decisive security policy.

In contrast, the "Am Israel" party issued a particularly harsh response, accusing Eisenkot of being responsible for the "conception" that led to the October 7th attacks. They criticized his past military leadership, stating that the General Staff under his tenure, which included Yair Golan, Aharon Haliva, and Herzi Halevi, promoted disastrous strategies. The party asserted that no decisive outcome could be achieved under a government led by Eisenkot and Golan.

The "Am Israel" party framed the upcoming elections as a choice between Eisenkot, Golan, and Abbas leading security policy, or Ofer Winter as Defense Minister and Yosef Haddad as Information Minister, who would advocate for the voluntary emigration of Gazans instead of their entry for work.

The "Yashar!" party responded to the Likud by stating that Netanyahu and the Likud have misled Israelis for 17 years and strengthened Hamas. They suggested that if the Likud had focused more on their mission and less on messaging, October 7th might have been avoided, adding that the Likud would be out of office in 12 days.

Now 14Right · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire