Court Rejects Bid to Ban Election Candidates From Channel 14 Broadcasts
Translated & summarized from Arutz Sheva by baba
The chairman of the Central Elections Committee dismissed a petition to ban election candidates from Channel 14 broadcasts, citing procedural grounds and alternative remedies. The petition argued the channel acted as a propaganda outlet for Likud and allied parties. A separate petition alleging a lack of ideological diversity on Channel 14 is still under review, with the channel ordered to respond by Friday.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- The Central Elections Committee chairman rejected a petition to ban election candidates from Channel 14.
- The petition claimed Channel 14 served as a propaganda channel for Likud and allied parties.
- The dismissal was based on procedural issues and alternative remedies with the Second Authority.
- A separate petition alleging lack of ideological diversity on Channel 14 is still pending.
- Channel 14 must respond to the diversity petition by Friday.
The chairman of the Central Elections Committee has dismissed a petition seeking to prohibit Channel 14 from broadcasting programs featuring candidates from the Likud, Religious Zionism, and Otzma Yehudit parties. The petitioners had also requested that the channel be barred from conducting election propaganda for these lists. The core argument was that Channel 14 functions as a propaganda channel, particularly for Likud, citing a section of the election law that forbids election propaganda on television and radio during the 60 days before an election, excluding legally permitted broadcasts.
The committee chairman did not rule on the merits of the claims. Instead, he determined that the petitioners have an alternative remedy through the Second Authority for Television and Radio, which specializes in such matters. Another reason for dismissal was a procedural issue: the petition included claims of violations during the 60-day pre-election period, but these specific claims were not included in the preliminary communication sent to the channel before the petition was filed. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without a hearing on the substance of the allegations.
Separately, another petition concerning Channel 14 is still before the committee chairman. This petition specifically alleges that the channel exclusively features candidates from a particular political bloc, which the petitioners claim violates the requirement for ideological diversity. The chairman has ordered Channel 14 to submit its response to this second petition by Friday, with a final decision pending.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Right 4Haredi 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
