Supreme Court Hears Case on Harassment of Lawyers
Translated & summarized from Maariv by baba
Israel's Supreme Court heard a petition from left-wing organizations seeking protection for lawyers against public harassment in courthouses. The petitioners allege they face intimidation, threats, and insults from activists, particularly when representing human rights groups or defendants in judicial overhaul cases. The Courts Administration stated that courthouses are not places for protest and that measures are in place to manage the situation, though justices questioned the consistency of enforcement.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Left-wing organizations petitioned Israel's Supreme Court against the Courts Administration over public harassment of lawyers.
- Lawyers claim they face intimidation, threats, and insults from activists, particularly those representing human rights groups.
- The harassment has expanded to lawyers involved in cases related to the protest against the judicial overhaul.
- The Courts Administration stated courthouses are not places for protest or demonstration.
- Justices questioned the consistency and effectiveness of the measures taken to prevent harassment.
- The petition seeks to establish and enforce clear rules to protect lawyers and court proceedings.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard a petition concerning the harassment of lawyers by the public within courthouses. Left-wing organizations, including the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, are petitioning the Courts Administration over the issue. The petition seeks to end politically motivated harassment, threats, and intimidation directed at lawyers, arguing it impedes their ability to represent clients and harms the legal system's proper functioning.
Attorneys representing human rights organizations and, more recently, those involved in the protest against the judicial overhaul, claim they are being confronted by right-wing activists. These activists allegedly surround them, shout insults, accuse them of treason and aiding terrorism, and document the incidents online. The petition emphasizes that while freedom of protest is important, it does not justify threatening lawyers, litigants, or judges, and calls for clear rules to allow protest in designated areas while protecting court attendees and proceedings.
During the hearing, Justice Dafna Barak-Erez, heading the panel, explained the petition focuses on the preparedness of court security in addressing public harassment of lawyers. She noted that the petitioners claim they are met with shouts and severe insults, creating a sense of threat, and are seeking protection within court premises, including prohibitions on protest and harassment activities.
Representing the Courts Administration, attorney Hadas Eran stated that the administration does not accept intentional disruptions aimed at harassing lawyers as a routine matter, asserting that "the hall of justice is not a place for protest or demonstration." She added that while court doors are open to the public due to the principle of open trials, entry for the purpose of protest or demonstration is forbidden.
However, Justice Barak-Erez questioned the consistency of enforcement, noting that in some instances, individuals with signs were politely asked to leave rather than being removed. The prosecution's representative responded that the administration is addressing the issue and has established policies and specific guidelines. Justice Gila Kenfy-Steinitz commented that while the phenomena are not unknown to her, the situation appears to have moderated recently.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 2
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
