Gush Etzion Rabbis Condemn Olive Harvest by Settler Youths, Citing Theft
Translated & summarized from Srugim by baba
Seven rabbis in Gush Etzion have ruled that it is forbidden for Jews to harvest olives from Arab orchards near settlements, even when security prevents Arab owners from accessing them. The rabbis stated that such actions constitute theft and can lead to desecration of God's name. They referenced Rabbi Yaakov Ariel's previous opinion suggesting alternative methods for harvesting the olives safely. The ruling was signed by several prominent rabbis from the Gush Etzion area.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Seven Gush Etzion rabbis ruled it is forbidden for Jews to harvest olives from Arab orchards near settlements.
- The rabbis stated that picking olives from Arab orchards under security restrictions constitutes theft.
- The ruling addresses the argument that Arab owners have abandoned their olives due to restricted access.
- The rabbis warned that such actions by observant Jews can lead to desecration of God's name.
- The ruling referenced Rabbi Yaakov Ariel's previous opinion on similar harvest situations.
- The rabbis emphasized the distinction between security access restrictions and property rights.
Seven rabbis from Gush Etzion and surrounding areas have issued a religious ruling declaring it forbidden for Jews to pick olives from Arab-owned orchards near settlement borders, even when security concerns prevent the Arab owners from accessing their land. The ruling, titled "Picking Fruits from Arab Orchards Near Settlement Borders," addresses the argument that preventing owners from reaching their crops constitutes abandonment, making the olives permissible for others to take. However, the rabbis firmly stated, "There is no permission to act this way."
Their decision is based on five religious arguments. Firstly, they noted that the behavior of the orchard owners indicates they have not abandoned the olives. Secondly, they pointed out that other Jews are willing to pick the olives on behalf of the owners, further demonstrating a lack of abandonment. The rabbis clarified that even if the owners had despaired of the harvest, this would not permit others to pick them, as despair over fruits still attached to the ground and in the owner's possession does not render them ownerless. The ruling explicitly states, "Therefore, there is a prohibition of theft here, and it has been explicitly ruled, 'Even an idol-worshipping gentile is forbidden to steal from or extort.'"
Beyond the religious prohibition, the rabbis warned of further consequences, including desecration of God's name among both Jews and non-Jews when observant Jews engage in such actions. The ruling references a previous opinion by Rabbi Yaakov Ariel, who addressed a similar situation during the First Intifada when Arabs were barred from approaching settlements. Rabbi Ariel determined that the orchard owners should not be considered to have abandoned their olives and suggested allowing the harvest through methods that do not pose a security risk, such as using Jewish workers or volunteers to pick the olives and transfer them to the Arab owners after covering expenses.
The ruling was signed by Rabbis Ze'ev Witman of Alon Shvut, Uri Lifshitz of Rosh Tzurim, Avi Blidstein of Tekoa, Moshe Shaphtar of Kfar Etzion, Yisrael Goldstein of Mitsad, Chaim Eiram of Elazar, and Rafi Ostroff, Chairman of the Religious Council. They emphasized that the prohibition on Arab owners accessing their land does not grant others the right to harvest the fruit, distinguishing between security-related access restrictions and the landowners' rights to their produce.
Mentioned