Ex-IDF Aide Suspected of Illegally Taking Classified Protocols
Translated & summarized from Mako by baba
Former Chief of Staff Tzachi Braverman is suspected of systematically taking around 30 classified protocols without authorization after the October 7th attacks. These documents reportedly concerned security discussions and were allegedly collected to shape the public narrative. The investigation also includes an alleged attempt by Braverman to alter a stenographic record of a conversation on October 7th. The case is now with the State Attorney for a decision on potential charges.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Former Chief of Staff Tzachi Braverman is suspected of illegally collecting about 30 classified protocols after October 7th.
- The sensitive documents reportedly included security discussions related to Gaza and Hamas.
- Braverman allegedly took the protocols without authorization and in violation of procedures.
- An investigation is examining an alleged attempt by Braverman to alter a stenographic record from October 7th.
- The case has been transferred to the State Attorney for a decision on filing charges.
Tzachi Braverman, the former Chief of Staff, is under investigation for allegedly systematically collecting approximately 30 classified protocols in the month following the October 7th Hamas attacks. These sensitive documents reportedly included materials from security discussions concerning Gaza and Hamas, and were allegedly taken without authorization and in violation of procedures. The investigation, being conducted by Lahav 433, suggests Braverman's actions were aimed at influencing the public narrative surrounding the events.
Further details emerging from the probe indicate that the collected protocols pertained directly to the period preceding October 7th. The former Military Secretary to the Prime Minister, Maj. Gen. Avi Gil, testified that an "unusual effort" to collect protocols began two to three weeks into the war. Gil stated that he was informed of this effort, which he described as being conducted "contrary to procedures," and that he personally notified the State Attorney at the time, advising her not to act on it immediately due to the ongoing war.
Separately, a "sabotage conversation" transcript was revealed, involving Braverman entering the Prime Minister's Office stenographer's room. He allegedly requested to alter the recorded time of a conversation between Gil and Prime Minister Netanyahu from 7:00 AM on October 7th to 6:29 AM. This alteration would have created the impression that Netanyahu received a full operational report immediately upon the start of the Hamas attack.
The case has now been transferred to the State Attorney for a decision on whether to file charges against Braverman. Key questions facing prosecutors include why Braverman was focused on October 7th stenography in January, why he acted against explicit written instructions from the State Attorney regarding protocol handling, and why he insisted on altering the record despite warnings from the stenographer.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Right 1Haredi 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
