Minister Sa'ar Slams Prosecution in Netanyahu Trial as 'Worthless'
Translated & summarized from Arutz Sheva by baba
Minister Gideon Sa'ar launched a strong attack on the prosecution in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trial, calling the proceedings "worthless" and a "farce." Sa'ar's criticism followed testimony from former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit, whose statements, according to Sa'ar, revealed questionable actions by the prosecution. The minister urged a "real soul-searching" within the prosecution, stating the issues transcended political support for Netanyahu.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Minister Gideon Sa'ar called the Netanyahu trial "worthless" and a "farce" after hearing testimony from former AG Avichai Mandelblit.
- Sa'ar cited Mandelblit's statements that actions were taken "behind his back without his approval."
- The minister also noted Mandelblit admitted to not verifying certain reports before the indictment.
- Sa'ar urged the prosecution to conduct a "real soul-searching" regarding its conduct.
- He stated the issues raised by the testimony were not dependent on political views of Netanyahu.
- Sa'ar attended the hearing to hear testimony firsthand, despite previous reservations about politicians attending.
Minister Gideon Sa'ar sharply criticized the prosecution's conduct in the trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday, following the first day of testimony from former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit. Speaking to reporters after the hearing, Sa'ar stated that the proceedings had become "worthless" based on what he heard in court. He recalled that over three years ago, when the court suggested reconsidering the bribery charge, he had called for the trial to end, describing it as a "farce."
Sa'ar argued that Mandelblit's testimony raised questions about the actions preceding the indictment. He cited Mandelblit's own statements that certain actions were illegal or done "behind his back without his approval," and that he himself admitted to not verifying certain journalistic reports that formed the basis of the bribery allegations. "The things that were heard today from the former Attorney General, when he defines things as illegal or things done behind his back without his approval, and on the other hand things he himself admits he did not check before the indictment was filed, journalistic publications that were the basis for the bribery claim, bring the trial to a place that is worthless," Sa'ar said.
He added that the prosecution needed to conduct a "real soul-searching." Sa'ar emphasized that the issues raised by the testimony were not dependent on political views regarding Netanyahu, urging "any decent person, regardless of support for or opposition to Netanyahu, to consider whether the things that came up in court are things a democratic state can accept."
When asked why he attended the hearing, despite previously suggesting politicians should not attend Netanyahu's trial, Sa'ar explained he did not intervene in the proceedings. He encouraged anyone who values the justice system and its reform to attend and hear the testimony firsthand.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Right 2
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.