Israel's Supreme Court Closes Case on 'Cheap Basket' Consumer Program
Translated & summarized from Mignews by baba
Israel's Supreme Court has closed a case against the "Israel Basket" program, which promoted Carrefour as having the lowest prices. The Ministry of Economy announced the program's end on October 14, 2026, leading the court to cancel hearings. Non-profits had sued, claiming the advertising was misleading about overall savings. The court ordered the state to pay 5,000 shekels in costs but did not rule on the program's legality.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Israel's Supreme Court closed the "Israel Basket" program case after the Ministry of Economy announced its end.
- The program promoted Carrefour as having the lowest prices, a claim challenged by consumer groups.
- Non-profits "Tzlal" and "Emun HaTzibur" filed the lawsuit, citing misleading advertising.
- Research suggested promotional items were cheaper while other goods at Carrefour increased in price.
- The state argued consumer protection laws did not apply to the administrative program.
- The court ordered the state to pay 5,000 shekels in legal costs to the plaintiffs.
Israel's Supreme Court of Justice has closed a legal case concerning the state-sponsored "Israel Basket" program, which promoted the Carrefour supermarket chain as offering the lowest prices in the country. The Ministry of Economy, which oversaw the project, announced the program's planned conclusion on October 14, 2026, without further extension. This announcement led the court, presided over by President Yitzhak Amit and including Justices Yael Willner and Ruth Ronen, to cancel scheduled hearings.
The lawsuit was initiated by the non-profit organizations "Tzlal" and "Emun HaTzibur," who argued that the state's advertising created a misleading impression of overall savings for consumers. They contended that the "cheapest basket" claims applied only to a limited selection of basic goods, while other items in the store could be more expensive. The plaintiffs cited academic research from Tel Aviv University suggesting that while promotional items were cheaper, other products at Carrefour simultaneously increased in price. They also pointed to a lack of clarity regarding which specific store branches participated and accused the initiative of distorting the reality of Israeli families' expenses.
Government lawyers argued that the Consumer Protection Law does not apply to the administrative work of government agencies. The court did not rule on the merits of the case or legally assess the ministry's actions. However, it ordered the state to pay the plaintiffs 5,000 shekels in legal costs, acknowledging that the case raised a significant public issue. The closure of the case leaves open questions about the permissibility of such state-sponsored advertising campaigns for future government initiatives.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Right 1Other 1