Israeli PM's Office Chief Suspected of Altering Oct. 7th Records
Translated & summarized from Mignews by baba
Israeli police suspect Tzachi Braverman, head of the Prime Minister's Office, of falsifying official documents by altering a timestamp on an October 7th call record. Braverman admitted to the change, claiming it was an unintentional correction. Former military secretary Avi Gill's statements brought the issue to light, suggesting the alteration aimed to bolster a narrative about the Prime Minister's immediate response. Prosecutors may close the case due to difficulties in proving intent, while the Likud party denies the allegations.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Tzachi Braverman, head of the Prime Minister's Office, faces potential charges for falsifying official documents.
- The alleged falsification involves altering a timestamp of a call between PM Netanyahu and his military secretary on Oct. 7, 2023.
- Braverman admitted to changing the record but claims it was an unintentional factual correction.
- Former military secretary Avi Gill's statements brought renewed attention to the case.
- Prosecutors may close the investigation due to difficulties in proving intent.
- The Likud party has strongly denied the accusations.
Israeli police investigators have gathered sufficient evidence to potentially charge Tzachi Braverman, the head of the Prime Minister's Office, with falsifying official documents. The alleged falsification involves altering the timestamp of a crucial early morning phone call on October 7, 2023, between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-military secretary, Avi Gill. The investigation materials have been forwarded to the government's legal advisor, who will make the final decision on prosecution. Braverman has admitted to altering the records but claims he acted to correct a factual inaccuracy, not with malicious intent. The timestamp for a secure line call was changed from 6:40 AM to 6:29 AM. However, legal experts note that proving intent in court could be difficult, making prosecutors inclined to close the case. Renewed attention to the matter stems from public statements by retired Major General Avi Gill. Gill stated that the prime minister's stenographer informed him of Braverman's demand to change the call time. Gill believes this manipulation aimed to support a narrative that Netanyahu issued orders from the very beginning of the Hamas invasion. He also noted Netanyahu's lack of reaction after Gill alerted the legal advisor. The Likud party vehemently denied the accusations, calling Gill's statements lies intended to discredit the government and reiterated that the Prime Minister received no timely warnings before the attack. This investigation is not Braverman's only legal challenge, as suspicions of leaking classified information previously prevented his appointment as Israel's ambassador to the UK.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 4Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
