Ex-AG Mandelblit Testifies for Netanyahu Defense in Corruption Trial
Translated & summarized from Kipa by baba
Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit will testify as a defense witness for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday in Jerusalem. Mandelblit's testimony will focus on whether police investigations against Netanyahu were conducted without his proper legal approval. The defense claims some approvals were verbal and that investigations exceeded their scope, while prosecutors maintain all actions were lawful. Mandelblit is scheduled to testify for up to seven days, though his testimony may not automatically invalidate the indictments.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit will testify for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's defense on Sunday.
- Mandelblit's testimony will address whether police investigations against Netanyahu lacked proper legal approval.
- The defense claims some investigative approvals were verbal and exceeded legal scope.
- Prosecutors assert that all investigations were conducted lawfully and properly approved.
- Nir Hefetz's treatment during the investigation is another expected topic of Mandelblit's testimony.
- Mandelblit is scheduled to testify for up to seven days in the Jerusalem District Court.
Seven years after indicting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit is set to testify on Sunday in the Jerusalem District Court. Unusually, Mandelblit, who was instrumental in bringing the "Cases of the Thousand" charges, will appear as a defense witness at the request of Netanyahu's lawyers. The core of his testimony will address a key defense argument: whether police conducted investigative actions against Netanyahu without Mandelblit's approval, contrary to law. The defense is expected to question Mandelblit about approvals he granted to investigators, some of which were verbal and given during meetings, not in formal written decisions. Judges have previously criticized the manner in which such approvals were granted.
The dispute intensified following testimony from police investigators, including Tzachi Havkin, who claimed that actions taken during the investigation of Case 1000 exceeded the scope of the approved investigation. However, the prosecution rejects these claims, asserting that all investigations were conducted lawfully. They contend that records from Mandelblit's meetings prove he authorized the examination of the gifts affair. Another issue expected to arise is the investigative tactic used against state witness Nir Hefetz and Mandelblit's handling of that situation. Mandelblit has been summoned for seven days of testimony, though the duration is not yet confirmed. His testimony could be significant in clarifying the defense's claims about the conduct of investigative authorities. However, even if procedural flaws are revealed, it would not automatically lead to the dismissal of the indictments.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Left 1Centre 6Right 6Haredi 3Arab 1Other 4
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
