Ex-Netanyahu Aide's Interview Sparks Political Firestorm, Calls for Probe
Translated & summarized from Panet by baba
Former Netanyahu military secretary Avi Gil's interview on Channel 12 has triggered a political crisis, with calls for a criminal probe into Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Gadi Eisenkot asked the State Attorney General to investigate potential criminal offenses, while Naftali Bennett demanded Netanyahu's resignation. Gil alleged that Netanyahu misrepresented documents about pre-October 7th meetings and that call logs were altered, which sources close to Netanyahu denied.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Former Netanyahu aide Avi Gil alleged doctored call logs and misrepresented documents regarding pre-October 7th meetings.
- Gadi Eisenkot requested a criminal investigation into Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
- Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett called for Netanyahu's immediate resignation.
- Avigdor Lieberman called for an investigation into Netanyahu on suspicion of treason.
- Sources close to Netanyahu claimed Gil knew about the attack and chose not to wake the PM.
Statements made by Avi Gil, former military secretary to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, during an interview with Israel's Channel 12 have ignited a political storm, leading to demands for a criminal investigation into the Prime Minister. Gadi Eisenkot, head of the "Yachad" party, has formally requested the State Attorney General, Gali Baharav-Miara, to examine whether Netanyahu committed criminal offenses. Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett stated that Netanyahu should resign immediately, while Avigdor Lieberman, head of the "Yisrael Beiteinu" party and a Knesset member, called for an investigation into suspicions of "treason."
Sources close to Netanyahu countered that Gil was aware of the impending attack and chose not to wake the Prime Minister at the time. During the interview, Gil asserted that documents published by Netanyahu and submitted to the State Comptroller, pertaining to meetings before the October 7th attack, did not reflect the complete, true picture. He also stated that Netanyahu received reports from security agencies during the period of protests against judicial changes, which indicated that Israel's enemies viewed it differently and that Israeli deterrence was eroding.
Gil further claimed that the scheduled times of calls with the Prime Minister on the morning of October 7th were altered in the "protocol" records. He alleged that these documents were compiled in the first two weeks of the war, and that he obtained information about suspicious actions concerning call logs, in violation of instructions.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Right 2Haredi 1Arab 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
