Airline CEOs Acknowledge No Absolute Security Against Cockpit Threats
Translated & summarized from Israel Hayom by baba
European airline CEOs Michael O'Leary and Carsten Spohr have stated that absolute security against internal cockpit threats is impossible following an attempted attack on a Flydubai flight. The incident, where a co-pilot allegedly attacked the captain, has led executives to acknowledge the limitations of current security measures. While safety remains high, they admitted that preventing deliberate acts by authorized pilots is extremely difficult, referencing the 2015 Germanwings crash as a past example.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- European airline CEOs admit absolute security against internal cockpit threats is impossible.
- The admission follows an attempted attack on a Flydubai flight by a co-pilot.
- Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary stated it's hard to legislate against a "crazy person" in the cockpit.
- Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr acknowledged no "absolute safety and security" exists in aviation.
- The Flydubai incident echoes the 2015 Germanwings crash, where a co-pilot intentionally crashed the plane.
- Executives differentiate between psychological evaluations and security screenings for pilots.
A recent attempted attack on a Flydubai flight has prompted European airline executives to admit that absolute security against internal cockpit threats is impossible. The incident, where a co-pilot allegedly attacked the captain and attempted to crash the plane en route to Israel, has raised concerns within the aviation industry.
Michael O'Leary, CEO of Ryanair Group, and Carsten Spohr, CEO of Lufthansa Group, addressed the issue at a meeting of Airlines for Europe in Brussels. Both leaders acknowledged the difficulty in preventing deliberate harm to an aircraft when the perpetrator is a trained and authorized pilot. "If there is a crazy person in the cockpit, it is very difficult to deal with it through legislation," O'Leary stated, highlighting the challenge of security systems designed to prevent external threats when the danger originates from within the cockpit itself.
Spohr echoed these sentiments, stating, "We must recognize that there is no absolute safety and security in this industry," while emphasizing that aviation safety remains very high. He noted that while pilot mental health screenings are already rigorous, they cannot guarantee the prevention of all intentional acts. Spohr referenced the 2015 Germanwings crash, where co-pilot Andreas Lubitz intentionally crashed an Airbus A320, killing all 150 people on board. Germanwings was a subsidiary of Lufthansa.
The Flydubai incident has reignited discussions about background checks and safety procedures, more than a decade after the Germanwings disaster prompted a review of such protocols. The statements from the Ryanair and Lufthansa CEOs, while not indicating security failures at their companies or immediate procedural changes, underscore the distinction between medical/psychological evaluations and security screenings. They highlight that a valid pilot's license does not guarantee the absence of malicious intent, and the Flydubai event demonstrated the severe consequences when the threat comes from someone already in control of the aircraft.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Right 1Other 1
