Supreme Court President Apologizes to Haredi Public for Remarks
Translated & summarized from Kipa by baba
Supreme Court President Yitzhak Amit apologized to the Haredi public for remarks he made about kosher phones, admitting his words caused offense. He stated that upon reviewing the discussion's recording, he realized his phrasing could have been better. The apology followed a complaint filed against him after he distinguished between a "kosher" phone and a "real" phone. Amit expressed regret for hurting feelings and stated his intention was not to cause offense.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Supreme Court President Yitzhak Amit apologized to the Haredi public for his remarks.
- Amit acknowledged his words about kosher phones caused offense.
- He stated his intention was not to cause harm.
- The apology followed a complaint filed against him.
- Amit realized his phrasing could have been better after reviewing a recording.
Supreme Court President Yitzhak Amit has apologized to segments of the Haredi public for remarks he made during a discussion concerning kosher phones. Amit acknowledged that his words, which implied a distinction between a "kosher" phone and a "real" phone, caused offense. He stated that upon reviewing a recording of the discussion, he realized his phrasing could have been better.
The apology came after Amit remarked, "Whoever has a kosher phone in one pocket has a phone to call with in the other. A kosher phone to show off and one real phone." This statement led to an official complaint filed against him with the commissioner, Asher Kolah, prompting Amit's public response.
In his written apology, Amit expressed regret, stating, "My words hurt parts of the Haredi public, and I had no intention whatsoever to do so. After re-watching the recording of the discussion, I believe that given the public sensitivity of the issue, it would have been better if the sentence that is the subject of the complaints had been phrased and expressed differently." He concluded by saying, "And I regret that the words hurt the feelings of the complainants or others in this context."
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 2Right 5Haredi 2Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
