Shin Bet Chief's Sister Calls to Close Jewish Department
Translated & summarized from Israel Hayom by baba
Yiska Haimov, sister of Shin Bet chief David Zini, called for the closure of the Shin Bet's Jewish department during a radio interview. She argued that lawbreakers should be handled by standard police and judicial means. Haimov also defended her brother against public criticism and suggested that public attention to her other brother Bezalel's case is due to his family ties to the Shin Bet chief. She believes Bezalel's contributions were for the war effort.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Yiska Haimov, sister of Shin Bet chief David Zini, called for closing the Shin Bet's Jewish department.
- Haimov believes lawbreakers should be handled by regular police and judicial systems.
- She addressed public criticism of her brother, the Shin Bet chief.
- Haimov commented on her brother Bezalel's house arrest, attributing public interest to family ties.
- She is convinced Bezalel's contributions were for the war effort.
Yiska Haimov, sister of Shin Bet chief David Zini and a candidate for the Noam L'Yisrael party, stated in a radio interview that the Jewish department within the Shin Bet should be closed. She made these remarks when asked about administrative orders and the handling of law violations by Jews in Judea and Samaria. Haimov believes that lawbreakers should be dealt with through the regular channels of the police and judicial system. She also addressed public criticism directed at her brother, the Shin Bet chief, stating that while she is not his spokesperson, she is familiar with his values and trusts the public to judge his actions over time rather than based on isolated quotes. Additionally, Haimov commented on the house arrest of her other brother, Bezalel, suggesting that public interest in his case stems from his familial connection to the Shin Bet head. After reviewing the investigation materials, she expressed conviction that any contributions he received were directly channeled to the war effort, asserting that "there was nothing and there will be nothing."
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Left 1Right 3
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
