International Law Supports Israeli Claims to Judea and Samaria, Not Palestinian Statehood
Summarized from Israel National News by baba
Farley Weiss argues that international law supports Israel's historical claim to Judea and Samaria, and that advocating for a Palestinian state is irrational and dangerous. He criticizes European nations for sanctioning Israel while supporting Palestinian statehood, citing historical events and the Palestinian Authority's "Pay to Slay" law. Weiss asserts that the "West Bank" is not Palestinian land under international law, referencing the San Remo conference and League of Nations mandate. He contends that creating a Palestinian state would lead to further conflict, not peace, and that historical evidence contradicts claims of Palestinian entitlement to the land.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- International law supports Israel's historical claim to Judea and Samaria, according to author Farley Weiss.
- European nations are criticized for sanctioning Israel while advocating for a Palestinian state.
- The Palestinian Authority's "Pay to Slay" law is cited as a reason to oppose a Palestinian state.
- Historical documents from 1920 and 1922 are presented as evidence of Jewish claims to the land.
- The 1939 British White Paper restricting Jewish immigration is called a violation of international law.
- Creating a Palestinian state is predicted to lead to more wars, not peace.
Israel National News publishes in English. The key points are summarized above. Read Israel National News’s full report from the link at the top of the page.