Likud Accuses Channel 12 of Spreading False Propaganda Against Netanyahu
Translated & summarized from Israel Hayom by baba
The Likud party accused Channel 12 of broadcasting "false political propaganda" against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the right-wing government during its October 7th anniversary coverage. Likud presented intelligence reports suggesting security officials believed Hamas was deterred prior to the attack, contrary to claims of advance warning. The party defended Netanyahu's actions, attributing key military successes to him and accusing Channel 12 of attempting to engineer public opinion to install a left-wing government.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Likud accused Channel 12 of broadcasting "false political propaganda" against Prime Minister Netanyahu during October 7th anniversary coverage.
- The party claimed Netanyahu received no advance warning of the Hamas attack, citing intelligence assessments of Hamas being deterred.
- Likud presented intelligence reports from May, July, and October indicating security officials believed Hamas sought quiet and regulation.
- The party asserted that others saw warning signs on the night of October 7th but failed to act.
- Likud credited Netanyahu with key military decisions and successes, including the Gaza ground maneuver and hostage rescues.
- The party alleged Channel 12's broadcasts were "consciousness engineering" aimed at toppling the right-wing government.
The Likud party issued a strong statement Wednesday evening, accusing Channel 12 of broadcasting "false political propaganda" against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the party during its special coverage marking three years since the October 7th Hamas attack. The party stated that while it mourned the victims, Channel 12 was engaged in a campaign to undermine the right-wing government and establish a left-wing government that would create a Palestinian state.
Likud asserted that Prime Minister Netanyahu did not receive advance warning of the Hamas attack, citing testimonies from former President Trump, Biden advisor Brett McGurk, and the governments of the UAE and Egypt. The party presented intelligence reports and communications from May, July, and early October, indicating that security officials repeatedly assessed Hamas as deterred, seeking regulation, and deserving of humanitarian leniencies to maintain quiet. One report from October 1st, just seven days before the attack, quoted research head Amit Saar stating that Sinwar's desire was to return to quiet, and a Shin Bet assessment on October 3rd suggested security quiet in exchange for leniencies could maintain stability.
The party's statement claimed Netanyahu was first informed of the Hamas attack at 6:29 AM on October 7th. It further alleged that others who saw warning signs overnight failed to act, not updating the police, emergency squads, kibbutzim, soldiers, or festival-goers. Likud contended that if the Prime Minister had been updated in real-time, the situation would have been different.
Likud also credited Netanyahu with deciding on a ground maneuver in Gaza and resisting pressure from President Biden for an air-only response. The party attributed to him the conquest of Gaza and Rafah, the successful rescue of hostages, the "beeper operation," the elimination of Nasrallah, Sinwar, and Deif, the capture of Mount Hermon, the assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists, and ultimately, saving Israel from destruction by Iranian nuclear bombs.
Concluding its statement, Likud accused Channel 12 of political motives behind its special broadcasts, calling it "false consciousness engineering" aimed at toppling the right-wing government and installing a left-wing government with Arab parties. This alleged new government, Likud claimed, would withdraw from Gaza, Judea and Samaria, Lebanon, and Syria, and establish a Palestinian state.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 3Right 3Haredi 1Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
