Columnist Slams Netanyahu, Allies for Blaming Oct. 7 Victims
Translated & summarized from Cursorinfo by baba
Israeli journalist Ben Caspit criticized Prime Minister Netanyahu and his allies for suggesting that families of October 7th victims should apologize to the premier. Caspit argued that Netanyahu, as the leader responsible for security, should be held accountable for the failures that led to the attacks. He dismissed Netanyahu's claims of Israel being on the brink of destruction as a narrative to protect his image, emphasizing that the nation's true strength lies in its citizens' resilience. The article also details Caspit's strong disagreement with journalist Inyon Magal's public demand for families to apologize to Netanyahu.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Journalist Ben Caspit believes families of Oct. 7 victims should not apologize to Prime Minister Netanyahu.
- Caspit holds Netanyahu responsible for security failures leading to the Oct. 7 attacks.
- He criticizes Netanyahu's narrative of Israel being on the brink of destruction.
- Caspit dismisses claims that Iran possessed nuclear bombs during the period.
- He condemns journalist Inyon Magal for demanding families apologize to Netanyahu.
- Caspit calls Netanyahu the "architect of the catastrophe" and criticizes his policies.
Journalist Ben Caspit argues it is absurd for families of victims from the October 7th attacks to apologize to Prime Minister Netanyahu, whom he holds responsible for their security failures. Caspit, writing for Maariv, describes the ongoing difficulty in articulating the horror of October 7th, even three years later, recalling specific victims like paramedic Amit Mann and observer Roni Eshel. He criticizes Netanyahu's repeated claims that Israel was on the brink of destruction, suggesting this narrative aims to portray the Prime Minister as the nation's savior.
Caspit contends that if Israel was indeed close to annihilation, the responsibility lies squarely with the leader in charge of security. He points to Israel's strong military and intelligence capabilities, arguing that the very notion of being on the verge of destruction by a terrorist group signifies a massive failure. The journalist dismisses Netanyahu's claims about Iran possessing nuclear bombs at the time as untrue and irrelevant to the core issue of security responsibility.
The article highlights Caspit's view that even a combined attack by Hezbollah and Hamas would not have led to Israel's destruction, though it could have caused a significant catastrophe. He emphasizes that Israel's true strength lies in its citizens' willingness to defend the country, citing the actions of volunteers who filled security gaps on October 7th before the IDF could respond.
Caspit labels Netanyahu the "architect of the catastrophe," accusing him of allowing Hamas and Hezbollah to grow stronger while promising to dismantle them. He then turns his attention to journalist Inyon Magal, who reportedly demanded that victims' families apologize to Netanyahu for blaming him for the hostage situation. Caspit expresses disbelief at Magal's statements, noting that families like the Bibas and Kedem were among those targeted.
Ultimately, Caspit asserts that the idea of victims apologizing to the person they deem responsible for their loss is the most significant development. He argues that Netanyahu consistently positions himself as a victim, despite his long tenure and alleged failures in security, including allowing hundreds of millions of dollars to flow to Hamas from Qatar. Caspit concludes that the responsibility for October 7th cannot be shifted onto the victims, stating that Netanyahu neglected not only the hostages but the entire country.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.