Israel's Competition Authority Approves, NewMed Cancels $6.7 Billion Gas Deal
Translated & summarized from Bizportal by baba
NewMed Energy and Ratio are in a dispute with Dalia over a $6.7 billion gas deal for Leviathan field gas, despite Israel's Competition Authority approving the transaction. The sellers claim they validly canceled the agreement in September due to unmet conditions, while Dalia insists it remains in effect. The disagreement now hinges on the legal right to cancel the contract, with potential implications for Israel's energy market and Dalia's new power stations. The parties may reach a new agreement or face a court decision.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- NewMed Energy and Ratio claim they validly canceled a $6.7 billion gas deal with Dalia.
- Israel's Competition Authority has removed most of its objections to the gas deal.
- Dalia insists the 20-year gas supply agreement for its new power stations remains valid.
- The dispute centers on whether the sellers had the legal right to cancel the contract in September.
- The deal's economic implications include potential higher export prices for Leviathan gas.
- Dalia needs a stable gas supply for its 10 billion shekel power station projects.
A dispute is ongoing between NewMed Energy, Ratio, and Dalia over a significant Israeli energy sector deal, despite the Competition Authority removing most of its reservations. In May, NewMed and Ratio, holding about 60% of the Leviathan gas field, agreed to sell gas to Dalia for an estimated $6.7 billion. The deal, set to begin in 2030 and last 20 years, was intended to supply two new power stations Dalia is building. However, in September, the sellers announced the deal's cancellation, citing delays in fulfilling its conditions. Dalia maintains the agreement is still valid, while NewMed insists the cancellation is effective. The Competition Authority's approval, which was a major hurdle, now leaves the core issue as a legal question of whether NewMed and Ratio had the right to cancel the contract in September. The deal's value was estimated at $6.7 billion, with initial annual supply of 1.3 billion cubic meters (BCM), rising to 1.7 BCM. The gas was earmarked for Dalia's two new power projects, estimated to cost 10 billion shekels and add 1,700 megawatts of capacity. The Competition Authority's initial concerns included the long contract duration, a 'take or pay' clause requiring Dalia to pay for a minimum amount of gas, and Dalia's ability to resell up to 15% of the gas. While the authority accepted the deal's structure, it reserved the right to revisit the resale aspect. The dispute's economic dimension involves potential higher prices in the export market, particularly to Egypt, which has seen increased export capacity from Leviathan. Dalia faces a practical challenge in securing stable gas supply for its new, costly power stations. The conflict could be resolved through a new agreement between the parties or a court ruling on the validity of the cancellation notice.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Other 4
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.