Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

SrugimGeneral

Radio Hosts Clash With Haaretz Reporter Over Bereaved Father's Remarks

Translated & summarized from Srugim by baba

Religious-rightCharged tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

An intense argument occurred on Israel Radio Galey Israel between hosts and a Haaretz reporter over the phrasing used to describe a bereaved father's criticism of a hostage survivor. The hosts defended the father, while the reporter argued his comments crossed a line.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Radio hosts and a Haaretz reporter clashed over remarks about a bereaved father.
  • The debate focused on the description of the father as "agitated."
  • Hosts defended the father's right to speak, citing his son's death.
  • The reporter argued the father's specific statement was illegitimate.
  • The exchange became personal, with harsh insults exchanged.

A heated debate erupted on the Israel Radio Galey Israel studio on Tuesday between hosts Yotam Zamri and Noam Fathi, and Haaretz reporter Michael Hauser Tov, concerning remarks made by bereaved father Itzik Bonzel about hostage survivor Yocheved Lifshitz. The dispute began when Zamri challenged Hauser Tov's use of the phrase "agitated parents" to describe Bonzel.

Zamri questioned the phrasing, asking if it implied Bonzel was being manipulated. Hauser Tov countered that a "political campaign" was organized to create such situations. Zamri then drew a parallel to the parents of hostages, asking if the same phrasing would be used if they criticized Prime Minister Netanyahu, suggesting Bonzel was defending his son's honor after his death in the war.

Hauser Tov clarified that he had no issue with Bonzel's style but with the specific statement, deeming it outside legitimate discourse. Co-host Noam Fathi joined in, defending Bonzel as a father whose son died fighting to rescue hostages. Hauser Tov accused the hosts of blindly supporting any statement, which angered Zamri, who argued that no one should judge a bereaved father.

Zamri told Hauser Tov he should "bow his head" when speaking to Bonzel, who lost his son. Hauser Tov concluded that while there is a great debt to both hostages and bereaved parents, criticism is permissible, and calling them "agitated" crosses a red line. Zamri ended the confrontation with harsh words, telling Hauser Tov to "apologize" and calling him "a piece of filth."

SrugimRight · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Related stories · 1

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the Wire