Qatar PM Blames Netanyahu for Gaza Deal Stalemate

Qatar's Prime Minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, stated in a CNN interview that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government are the primary obstacles to advancing a peace plan in the Gaza Strip. He asserted that Israel is not fulfilling its commitments under the understanding memorandum, is acting contrary to agreements, and is hindering efforts to achieve a ceasefire.

Al Thani suggested that only Netanyahu and his "far-right government" benefit from the current situation. He presented data indicating Israel controls approximately 70% of Gaza and continues to harm civilians. The Qatari PM claimed Israel is violating its humanitarian aid obligations, with only about 150 trucks entering Gaza daily compared to a commitment of over 600.

Addressing accusations of financial support for Hamas's military wing, Al Thani clarified that all Qatari aid to Gaza over the years was coordinated with the Israeli government, Israeli intelligence agencies, and the UN. He detailed that funds were used for purchasing gas from Israel, assisting needy families from Israeli-approved lists, and paying salaries to government employees, a step taken at Israel's request as a temporary solution.

Al Thani dismissed allegations in the "Qatargate" affair as absurd, denying claims of bribery or government infiltration. He contended that the Netanyahu government has sabotaged attempts to reach a ceasefire and secure the release of hostages, making Qatar a "scapegoat" in Israeli political discourse. He recalled that the previous Israeli government under Naftali Bennett had previously praised Qatar's actions in Gaza, and now the country is being attacked by elements seeking escalation.

On a regional level, Al Thani revealed that indirect talks between the United States and Iran took place during the week to resume diplomatic efforts. He emphasized Qatar's opposition to blocking maritime navigation in the region and stated that a military victory against Iran is not achievable, regardless of U.S. strength. He concluded that regional countries desire a security arrangement that provides stability for all parties.