Israeli Election Committee Disqualifies Arab Parties and Candidates
The Central Elections Committee has decided to disqualify the Joint List, its candidate Sami Abu Shehadeh, MK Ofer Cassif, and the United Arab List from running in the upcoming Knesset elections. The decisions, made by majority votes, will be finalized by the Supreme Court.
The Joint List was disqualified by an 18-5 vote, with one abstention. The disqualification of Abu Shehadeh, proposed by the Otzma Yehudit party, passed with 31 votes in favor and 4 against. MK Cassif was deemed "prohibited from participating in Knesset elections" by a 19-member majority. The United Arab List was also disqualified by an 18-5 vote with one abstention.
Leaders of the disqualified parties condemned the committee's decisions, labeling them as "Kahanist" and "racist." Yusef Jabareen, head of the Joint List, stated that the committee's actions are part of a "campaign of incitement and delegitimization" against Arab citizens and their political representatives. He expressed hope that the Supreme Court would overturn the decisions, emphasizing the importance of national unity in the face of what he called "fascist" government.
The legal advocacy group Adalah, representing the Joint List, argued that the disqualification requests were based on outdated laws and lacked sufficient evidence. Adalah stated that the decision "seriously harms the political representation of the Arab public." The group also noted that the request to disqualify Abu Shehadeh was based on a broad interpretation of his alleged support for "armed struggle," which Adalah contends contradicts his 30-year public record and explicit condemnations of violence after October 7th.
The disqualified parties and groups have vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court, asserting their right to political participation and representation. They view the disqualifications as an attempt by right-wing factions to suppress Arab voices and discourage voter turnout. The United Arab List specifically believes the move is intended to prevent them from playing a role in potentially changing the government, referencing their participation in the previous "government of change."
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.