Venice Film Festival Director Rejects Boycott Calls, Cites Film Quality
Alberto Barbera, the artistic director of the Venice Film Festival, has dismissed claims of a boycott against Israeli cinema, asserting that film selection is based solely on artistic merit. In comments to Variety ahead of the festival's opening, Barbera stated that if a high-quality Russian or Israeli film were submitted, it would be invited. He also acknowledged that the current conflict in Israel and Gaza, along with the Palestinian issue, are prominent themes this year, with four selected works addressing the situation.
Barbera emphasized the festival's stance: engaging with significant political content while refusing to disqualify films based on nationality. This approach is exemplified by the inclusion of "Journey to Jericho" by Amos Gitai, a co-production involving Israel, which will screen out of competition. The film incorporates archival footage, including conversations with Yitzhak Rabin, and documentation of the Bedouin community in Khan al-Ahmar.
Additionally, the documentary "NAZA," directed by Israelis Yuval Abraham and Rachel Shore and registered as a British production, is competing in the main section. The film reportedly examines mechanisms behind the killing of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, highlighting the distinction between creators' identities and their film's country of production.
The festival faced controversy regarding its traditional jury press conference, initially canceled but reinstated after public outcry. This cancellation had raised questions about avoiding potential confrontations related to Israel, particularly after the previous year's jury president, Alexander Payne, sidestepped a question about the Gaza war. Festival organizers attributed the cancellation to scheduling conflicts, denying political motivations.
Meanwhile, over 200 cultural figures, including Roger Waters and Annie Ernaux, signed a letter from the group Venice4Palestine. They called for tangible support for Palestinians, demanding the hoisting of the Palestinian flag, suspension of agreements with Israeli government-affiliated entities, and protection for industry professionals speaking out against what they term genocide.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.