Liberman Accuses Netanyahu of Security Failures and Political Restraint on Gaza Incursions
Avigdor Liberman accused Prime Minister Netanyahu of surrendering security decision-making autonomy and criticized economic transfers to Hamas. He revealed the IDF detected a militant raid drill but was ordered not to act by political leaders.
הידיעה ב-5 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Liberman claims Netanyahu gave up independent security decision-making, risking Israeli safety.
- 20% of goods entering Gaza reportedly benefit Hamas financially.
- Netanyahu approved $400 million transfers to suppliers vetted by Hamas.
- IDF identified 50 militants training for a raid on a Jewish settlement.
- Political leadership refused IDF's request to act against militants and forbade firing.
Avigdor Liberman, chairman of the Yisrael Beiteinu party, criticized Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a statement at the Kerem Shalom crossing near the Gaza envelope. Liberman accused Netanyahu of relinquishing independence in security decision-making, warning that this approach is a return to the policies that led to the deadly October 7 attacks. He highlighted that 20% of the value of every truckload entering Gaza ends up in Hamas's hands. Liberman also revealed that Netanyahu approved an agreement for the Peace Council to transfer $400 million to suppliers and service providers based on Hamas's lists.
Furthermore, Liberman claimed that the Israel Defense Forces identified a training exercise involving approximately 50 militants rehearsing a raid and takeover of a Jewish settlement. Despite the IDF's request to act immediately, the political leadership refused to authorize action and instructed troops not to fire. Liberman's remarks underscore his criticism of the current government's handling of security and economic dealings with Gaza.
The situation remains tense as political and military leaders debate the appropriate response to threats from Gaza militants and the economic arrangements that may empower Hamas. Liberman's statements suggest a call for a more assertive security policy and greater political autonomy in military decisions.
מוזכרים
אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.
מרכז 3ימין 3חרדית 1
