Tiberias Football Club Faces Initial Hearing in Match-Fixing Case Ahead of New Season
Tiberias football club attended its first hearing in a match-fixing case on August 5, 2026, at the Israeli Football Association's disciplinary court. The hearing focused on procedural issues and scheduling, with the first evidentiary session likely after the new league season starts, reducing chances of early relegation.
הידיעה ב-6 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Tiberias football club held its initial match-fixing hearing on August 5, 2026, at the Israeli Football Association.
- Prosecutor Gilad Bergman urged speeding up the process due to the upcoming league season in August.
- Defense lawyers said they had not received all investigation materials, including witness lists.
- Tensions rose when Ashdod's lawyer intervened, causing a brief hearing suspension.
- The first evidentiary hearing is expected only after the league starts, delaying possible relegation decisions.
- A schedule for the case will be set after parties submit requests by the next day, with about 14 days for preparation.
The Tiberias football team appeared on August 5, 2026, at the Israeli Football Association's disciplinary court for the first hearing concerning a match-fixing scandal. The club was represented by attorneys Eyal Yaffe and Zion Amir, with the hearing presided over by chief adjudicator Noam Liubin. The association's prosecutor, Gilad Bergman, also participated.
Bergman criticized delays in the process, questioning why it took three days to approve the investigation materials and why a related petition to the Supreme Court had not yet been filed. He emphasized the importance of expediting the proceedings, especially with the new league season approaching in August, and requested that any preliminary motions be submitted alongside the defense statement to speed up the case.
Attorney Amir responded that Tiberias had not yet received all the investigation materials, including a list of prosecution witnesses, which he described as essential and not a mere formality. During the hearing, a lawyer from Ashdod, Noa Milshtein, intervened, leading to a tense exchange and a temporary suspension of the session.
After the break, Amir argued that Hapoel Jerusalem, another implicated team absent from the hearing, was more involved in the case than Ashdod. Bergman accused the defense of using procedural tactics to delay the league's start, while Amir requested 14 days from receipt of all materials to prepare a proper defense.
Chief adjudicator Liubin concluded that the parties would submit their requests by the next day, after which a schedule would be set, allowing approximately 14 days for preparations. The first evidentiary hearing is expected to take place only after the league begins, complicating the possibility of Tiberias being relegated before the season starts.
מוזכרים
אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.
מרכז 3