Netanyahu's Office Linked to Qatar Amid Election Interference Claims
Columnist Ben Caspit alleges Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office had ties with Qatar during the conflict, raising questions about his actions concerning the Gulf state. Caspit suggests that if Qatar is found to have interfered in elections, any disqualification of Arab sector votes would likely not change the overall bloc balance. The article implies a potential plan to undermine election credibility, questioning Netanyahu's pre-election meeting with the Police Commissioner.
הידיעה ב-5 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Columnist Ben Caspit alleges Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office maintained ties with Qatar during the conflict.
- Caspit questions Netanyahu's actions regarding Qatar, including preventing its enemy state declaration.
- Allegations suggest Qatar may have interfered in Israeli elections.
- Disqualified Arab sector votes might not significantly alter the overall bloc balance.
- Netanyahu's pre-election meeting with the Police Commissioner is viewed with suspicion.
Amidst allegations of Qatari interference in Israeli elections, columnist Ben Caspit suggests that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office maintained ties with Doha during the conflict. Caspit raises questions about who in the political system has connections with Qatar, specifically asking who prevented Qatar from being declared an enemy state, whose office worked for Qatar during the war, who apologized profusely to Qatar, and who convinced the Emir of Qatar to flood Gaza with hundreds of millions of dollars. Caspit asserts that the answer to all these questions is Benjamin Netanyahu.
Caspit argues that if the roles were reversed, the 'poison machine' would have long ago promoted a conspiracy theory that Netanyahu colluded with Qatar to sway election results, allowing him to invalidate the elections and then proceed to a second round with a weakened opposition and a shattered public trust. He also notes that Netanyahu's insistence on meeting the Police Commissioner on the eve of the elections takes on new significance in this context, questioning whether it was part of a well-planned campaign to undermine the election's credibility from the outset.
The article also posits that even if Qatari bribery is found and votes from the Arab sector are disqualified, leading to a potential loss of three mandates, these votes would be redistributed among all parties. This redistribution, the author suggests, would not alter the overall balance between the blocs, as the total number of votes remains the same, benefiting everyone. Therefore, the author advises against premature panic or a political witch hunt, emphasizing that any investigation into the matter should be conducted impartially.
לא אותו אירוע: ידיעות אחרות שחולקות עם הידיעה הזו אנשים, מקומות או נושא. רקע, תגובות והמשכים.
