Testimony Opens in Israeli Food Market Price-Fixing Case
תומצת מתוך Calcalist על ידי baba
Testimony opened in the Israeli food market price-fixing case against Victory’s Eyal Raviv and Yochananoff’s Eitan Yochananoff. The hearing centers on allegations that Raviv tried to push suppliers to raise prices for competitors first, based on recordings and messages found on his phone. Competition Authority officials said the conduct, if proven, would amount to unlawful coordination of price increases.
הידיעה ב-5 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Testimony began in the food market price-fixing trial a year and a half after indictment.
- Eyal Raviv and Eitan Yochananoff are among the senior defendants.
- Raviv is accused of pushing suppliers to raise rivals’ prices first.
- Evidence includes phone recordings and WhatsApp messages seized by regulators.
- The Competition Authority said the case involves unlawful coordination of prices and promotions.
Testimony began Wednesday, a year and a half after indictments were filed in the food market case, against senior figures accused of coordinating moves that would lead to price increases. The defendants include Victory chain owner and CEO Eyal Raviv and Yochananoff owner and CEO Eitan Yochananoff.
This phase focuses on one of three alleged schemes in the indictment, in which Raviv is accused of trying to pressure food suppliers to raise prices for his competitors, Rami Levy and Yochananoff, before raising prices himself. The suppliers expected to testify about the alleged coordination are Eli Shani, vice president for trade and sales at Dr. Fischer, and Uri Levi, CEO of the canned-food company Beit Hashita.
According to a report first published by Calcalist, recordings and WhatsApp messages found on Raviv’s phone during a Competition Authority investigation show him pressing suppliers, including Levi and Shani, to increase prices. At the opening of the hearing, Ofer Maaz, head of the Competition Authority’s criminal department, said food retail is a major public concern because it affects the cost of living.
Maaz told the court that the case involves “serious events” in which a retailer allegedly acted to bring about higher prices. He said the law bars coordinating or attempting to coordinate price hikes, restricting promotions, or coordinating with a rival chain. He added that the evidence shows an attempt to reach understandings on price increases, and that after years in which raising prices was difficult because of the cottage-cheese protest, Raviv sought to be the first to move, in his words, to pull “the finger out of the dam” and trigger a “tsunami of price increases.”
מוזכרים
אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.
מרכז 2ימין 1חרדית 1אחרים 2
לא אותו אירוע: ידיעות אחרות שחולקות עם הידיעה הזו אנשים, מקומות או נושא. רקע, תגובות והמשכים.