התחברות ל-baba News

חשבון אחד לאתר, לאייפון ולאנדרואיד — המנוי נשאר איתכם.

או קוד במייל

חיפוש סיפורים

הקלידו לפחות שני תווים. התוצאות מגיעות מכל המערכות ש-baba קורא.

↑↓ למעבר · ↵ לפתיחה · esc לסגירה

התחברות ל-baba News

התחברו כדי להמשיך לשאול. News Plus מסיר את המגבלה היומית.

או קוד במייל

Maarivעולם

Trump Chooses a Deal, as Israel Pays the Strategic Price

תומצת מתוך Maariv על ידי baba

מרכז

עברית · מערכת חדשות אחת

An Israeli opinion column says Donald Trump’s Iran policy shift, including an apparent push for a deal, is driven by politics and could harm Israel. It is framed against a Hezbollah attack in southern Lebanon that killed four Israeli soldiers and prompted Israeli strikes, though not on Beirut because of U.S. limits.

הידיעה ב-5 שורות · תקציר של baba

  • Trump is portrayed as favoring an Iran deal over continued confrontation.
  • The author says the shift may reflect domestic politics ahead of the U.S. midterms.
  • Four IDF soldiers were killed in a Hezbollah strike in southern Lebanon.
  • Israel struck targets in Lebanon but avoided Beirut under U.S. constraints.
  • The column argues Israel must rely on its own strength, not outside support.

The article argues that President Donald Trump has sharply shifted U.S. policy on Iran for political and personal reasons, preferring an agreement at almost any cost over continued confrontation. The author says the move may reflect domestic calculations ahead of the U.S. midterm elections, with Trump possibly valuing stability over a security escalation.

That shift, the piece says, is drawing growing criticism, especially from pro-Israel Republicans who struggle with Washington moving closer to Tehran while distancing itself from Israel, described as America’s key Middle East ally. The author warns that the decision to “turn away from Israel” at such a sensitive moment could later prove a strategic mistake.

The column was written in the wake of a deadly overnight attack in southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah fire struck the tank of Israeli soldiers and killed four IDF fighters. The Israeli army responded by striking targets across Lebanon, but did not hit Beirut, partly because of limits imposed by the U.S. administration.

The author says the strikes may have sent a message to Hezbollah, but argues that Israel now needs decisive results, not messages. After months of security erosion and loss of life, he says defeating Hezbollah matters more than signaling, and that Israel cannot rely entirely on others for its security. The piece concludes that the United States should recognize that Israel is not only an ally, but the frontline in the regional fight against terrorism and extremism.

Maarivמרכז · ירושלים

התחברות ל-baba News

התחברו כדי לעקוב אחרי מערכות, נושאים ואנשים.

או קוד במייל

עולםנושא

התחברות ל-baba News

התחברו כדי לעקוב אחרי מערכות, נושאים ואנשים.

או קוד במייל

מוזכרים

פתיחת המבזקים