Sign in to baba News

The Desk, the news read to you every hour, is part of News Plus.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Tel Aviv Court Rejects NIS 36 Million Class Action Over Access to Nahal Asi Stream

By אלי אשכנזי
Translated & summarized from Walla by baba
The story · English

The Tel Aviv District Court dismissed a class action lawsuit seeking NIS 36 million against Kibbutz Nir David regarding public access restrictions to the Nahal Asi stream. Filed in June 2020 on behalf of residents of Beit She'an and other visitors, the suit alleged discriminatory and illegal blocking of public entry to this natural water resource. Plaintiffs claimed violations of water laws and unjust enrichment, highlighting the contrast between closed public access for privacy and the kibbutz’s commercial tourism activities along the stream.

Judge Idit Barkovitz ruled that the case was unsuitable for class action status, emphasizing the complexity of balancing conflicting rights. She noted that while the public does not have an absolute right to unrestricted access through the kibbutz’s main gate, the kibbutz must also respect public water rights and act fairly. The decision aligns with a 2021 Haifa District Court ruling that recognized the stream and its banks as public land but also acknowledged the kibbutz’s lawful ownership rights.

The court endorsed a state-proposed balanced plan allowing controlled public access on the southern bank and along the "Green Beach" area, while restricting free passage on the northern bank adjacent to residences to protect residents’ privacy and security. The ruling also considered the kibbutz’s significant private investments in cleaning and restoring the neglected stream, which, although not conferring ownership, were relevant to access conditions.

Procedurally, the court rejected claims that the kibbutz operates as a commercial entity under consumer protection law or as a public venue discriminating against visitors. It affirmed that the kibbutz is a private cooperative serving its members, not the general public, and dismissed demands for retroactive financial compensation, noting the state’s prior failure to regulate the matter. However, the court left open the constitutional question of the kibbutz’s authority to block its gates, signaling that this issue remains unresolved.

Read the original at Walla

Keep up with

WallaCentre · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

You’ve used your five follows

News Plus follows as many newsrooms, topics and people as you like.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal
See News Plus

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

You’ve used your five follows

News Plus follows as many newsrooms, topics and people as you like.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Live Terminal
See News Plus
Open the live terminal