Amichai Segal Criticizes IDF for Inconsistent Enforcement on Political Expression by Reservists
Political commentator Amichai Segal criticized the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for inconsistent enforcement regarding reservists expressing political views while in uniform. Segal highlighted a recent case where a reservist was dismissed within hours after posting a video supporting Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. He contrasted this with previous instances where other reservists openly expressed political opinions or appeared in uniform during political interviews without facing disciplinary action.
Segal shared examples including a retired Major Shahar Veron from the "Shoulder to Shoulder" organization who gave an interview in uniform, and Lieutenant Colonel Eli Meiri, a reserve armor battalion deputy commander who appeared in uniform delivering a political message. Meiri serves in the same brigade as the dismissed soldier. Segal questioned why only the reservist who supported Smotrich was punished, while others faced no consequences.
While Segal personally supports the IDF's decision to dismiss the soldier to maintain discipline and prevent politicization of the military, he condemned the selective enforcement as unfair and damaging. He called on the IDF to explain why some political activists in uniform continue to serve, including former commanders who run for political office and frequently appear in uniform. Segal emphasized the need for consistent standards, stating, "Be wise with the strong, not the weak."
He reiterated his view that the IDF should remain apolitical but stressed that the current uneven application of rules undermines this principle. Segal also dismissed the political campaign by reservists supporting former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett as irrelevant to the discussion.
The controversy raises questions about the IDF's handling of political expression among reservists and the boundaries between military service and political activism in Israel.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.