Security06:08 · 14h ago

Israeli Court Cancels Order to Restore Contact Between Mentally Ill Father and Children

YnetCenter
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
The story · English

The District Court in Lod recently overturned a Family Court ruling from Petah Tikva that had ordered the renewal of contact between a violent father struggling with mental health issues and his two children. Judges Vered Plaut, Zvi Weitzman, and Tzvia Gerdstein-Pfakin ruled that the father must first undergo anger management treatment before any contact is resumed.

Three years ago, the father attempted suicide and was hospitalized for several weeks. Before his attempt, he called his son and blamed him, saying, "It's because of you." He later posted images of his children in a format resembling hostages in Gaza, claiming parental alienation by the mother. Despite these concerns, the Family Court had ordered contact renewal under supervision last June, ignoring the court-appointed guardian's recommendation to "let the minors go" and the mother's warnings about the father's dangerous and violent behavior, including poisoning incidents at her workplace.

The mother appealed, citing the father's violent acts such as breaking into her storage and damaging her property, including her car. She argued the Family Court erred in ruling the father posed no danger to the children. The father denied posing any risk and accused his ex-wife of severe parental alienation, belittling him in the children's eyes.

The District Court unanimously found the Family Court's decision mistaken, emphasizing that while restoring family contact is important, it should not come at the expense of the children's welfare. The court criticized the Family Court for disregarding professional advice to first treat the father and children separately and only later consider supervised meetings. The judges highlighted the father's history of violence and the need for his treatment before any regular contact could be safely resumed.

Consequently, the District Court canceled the previous ruling and sent the case back for further proceedings based on professional recommendations, directing the father to anger management therapy first.

Read the original at Ynet
Open the live terminal