General07:43 · Aug 16

Israeli Family Court Rejects Father's Request to Increase Child Visit Penalties and Expand Visitation

YnetCenter
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
The story · English

The Family Court in Petah Tikva recently dismissed a divorced father's requests to increase fines for missed child visitations and to expand his visitation rights with his daughter. The father sought to raise the penalty for each missed meeting from 150 to 1,000 shekels, arguing the current fine was ineffective and that his ex-wife treated it like a parking ticket, deliberately obstructing visits. He also requested to increase visitation frequency to twice a week at his home, rather than the current once-weekly three-hour meetings supervised by the mother in a public setting near her residence.

The mother opposed both requests, describing the father as unreliable and accusing him of failing to notify her in advance when he would miss visits. She requested that any fines be applied equally to both parents. Family Court Judge Shirly Shay ruled the proposed fine increase as excessive and unjustified, finding no evidence of systematic obstruction by the mother. Regarding visitation expansion, the judge cited professional opinions that the child is not yet emotionally ready for increased or unsupervised visits, warning that forcing such changes could cause regression or refusal to meet the father altogether.

The court emphasized the progress made in the father-daughter relationship but stressed that it cannot be rushed or imposed against the child's will. The father was urged to exercise patience and allow the child to continue therapy, with the expectation that visitation times will naturally increase over time. The judge also dismissed the father's claims of parental alienation, noting positive interactions during visits where the child expressed love and happiness with her father.

The ruling reflects the court's cautious approach to balancing parental rights with the child's emotional well-being in custody disputes. Legal representatives for both parents participated in the case, and the decision was supported by expert input on parental alienation and child psychology.

Read the original at Ynet
Open the live terminal