Finance Minister Slashed Fuel Tax Amid Economic Concerns
Translated & summarized from Calcalist by baba
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich ordered a reduction in fuel excise tax, costing the state 150 million shekels, despite professional recommendations against it. Critics argue the move is fiscally irresponsible given Israel's high deficit and ignores deeper economic issues.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Finance Minister Smotrich reduced fuel excise tax, costing 150 million shekels.
- The decision overrides professional recommendations against the tax cut.
- Critics deem the move fiscally irresponsible due to Israel's high deficit.
- The tax cut is seen as a political 'band-aid' ignoring deeper economic issues.
- Fuel price increases are attributed to global factors, not domestic taxes.
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has ordered a reduction in the excise tax on fuel, a move expected to cost the state approximately 150 million shekels. This decision comes shortly after the Ministry of Energy announced that fuel prices were set to rise by 52 agorot. Smotrich's directive overrides the professional recommendation from his ministry's officials against lowering the tax, particularly given the current election period.
This latest tax cut adds to a previous 350 million shekel reduction Smotrich implemented in September. While a senior official in the Finance Ministry acknowledged the political temptation to lower fuel prices before an election, especially when it can influence public perception of the economy, the article argues that this move is fiscally irresponsible. Israel's budget deficit is already high at 4.9% of GDP, and the country is on a path of increasing debt-to-GDP ratio, making it unable to afford such revenue losses.
The article contrasts this action with the previous Bennett-Lapid government, which reduced fuel excise tax during a budget surplus and when inflation was a major concern, providing a rationale for energy price moderation. Currently, however, the article contends that Israel is past the peak of inflation, and such a measure is unnecessary. The rise in fuel prices is attributed to global factors, including tensions between the US and Iran, and the strengthening dollar against the shekel, rather than domestic tax increases.
The author criticizes Smotrich's tenure as one characterized by applying "band-aids" to economic problems instead of addressing underlying issues. The decision to subsidize fuel prices is seen as a short-term political maneuver that creates an illusion of state omnipotence, ignoring the long-term economic consequences and the need for fiscal responsibility. The piece suggests that Smotrich consistently downplays economic challenges, such as the impact of the ongoing war and the need to integrate Haredi and Arab populations into the workforce, preferring to focus on positive, albeit superficial, economic indicators.
