Minister Elkin Criticizes Police Interrogation in Netanyahu Trial
Minister Ze'ev Elkin sharply criticized police investigators during his cross-examination in the trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, alleging they asked theoretical questions that infringed upon his parliamentary immunity. Elkin contended that investigators, lacking understanding of Knesset operations, treated him as an "expert witness" and posed hypothetical scenarios, which he felt undermined his protected status. He specifically cited questions about his actions and parliamentary procedures as examples of this overreach.
Prosecutor Alon Gladin countered Elkin's claims, asserting that the minister's account distorted the reality of the interrogation. Gladin argued that Elkin volunteered extensive explanations about political tactics to stall the "Israel Hayom" law, rather than being prompted by investigators. Elkin, however, maintained that he elaborated on parliamentary mechanisms only because investigators requested clarification on basic political and parliamentary functions, such as the role of a minister in two portfolios or the workings of Knesset committees.
The discussion also focused on Elkin's past statements regarding the "Israel Hayom" law and coalition dynamics. Gladin presented discrepancies between Elkin's current testimony and his 2018 statements, particularly concerning the effectiveness of the Prime Minister's appeal option and his prior knowledge of coalition partners' intentions to vote for the bill. Elkin attributed these differences to the nature of memory, distinguishing between recalling specific details of meetings and remembering general political atmospheres and policy directions.
Elkin emphasized his extensive experience in coalition management, stating he had successfully navigated similar situations by gathering intelligence and understanding personal relationships within the Knesset. He explained that his insights into coalition partners' potential votes were based on his professional expertise and his close working relationship with Netanyahu, even when not holding an official coalition chairman position. The testimony touched upon the core of Case 2000, which involves alleged discussions between Netanyahu and "Yedioth Ahronoth" publisher Arnon Mozes regarding reciprocal favors concerning media coverage and the "Israel Hayom" newspaper.
