Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Every Not Everywhere story, no daily limit
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

to move · to open · esc to close

Live Terminal
Compare full coverage across 3 outlets
Sports18:25 · Sep 5

VAR Controversy Erupts Over Haifa Penalty Decision

N12Center
Translated & summarized from N12 by baba
The story · English

A controversial penalty decision against Maccabi Haifa during their match against Hapoel Petah Tikva has sparked debate, particularly regarding the explanation provided by the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system. The incident occurred early in the first half when a penalty was awarded after the ball struck the body of Hapoel player Wanderson Tsunami. Despite the ball reportedly being far from Tsunami's hand, the VAR team advised the referee to award the penalty, citing that Tsunami's hand was "so open" that a penalty kick was warranted.

Maccabi Haifa goalkeeper Omri Glazer successfully saved the penalty, taken by Hapoel's Klay. This save marked a significant moment for Glazer, who had previously conceded 17 consecutive penalties since his last save in the 2017/18 season. In total, Glazer has saved three out of 34 penalties faced in his career.

The explanation from the VAR team has been described as "unusual" by sports media, given the ball's proximity to Tsunami's body rather than his hand. The decision and its subsequent justification have led to scrutiny of the VAR's application in this specific instance.

Read the original at N12
Full coverage · 3 outlets
100% centerFirst: Sport5 · Sep 5

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Center 2Unrated 1
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Who covered this

2 centre

  • Centre3 / 11
Open the live terminal