התחברות ל-baba News

חשבון אחד לאתר, לאייפון ולאנדרואיד — המנוי נשאר איתכם.

או קוד במייל

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Ask Duki without the monthly limit — answers from the coverage, with sources
  • Save articles, synced between the web and the app
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. תנאי המנוי.

המנוי פותח גם את האפליקציה.

Search stories

הקלידו לפחות שני תווים. התוצאות מגיעות מכל המערכות ש-baba קורא.

to move · to open · esc to close

מסוף חי

התחברות ל-baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

או קוד במייל

לראות את התמונה המלאה

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Ask Duki without the monthly limit — answers from the coverage, with sources
  • Save articles, synced between the web and the app
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. תנאי המנוי.

המנוי פותח גם את האפליקציה.

Prince Harry Loses £50 Million Lawsuit Against UK Media Group

מאת ציון בנג'ו
תורגם ותומצת מתוך Now 14 על ידי baba
The story · English

The High Court in London has dismissed a major lawsuit filed by Prince Harry, Elton John, and several other prominent public figures against the media group that publishes the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, and MailOnline. The plaintiffs sought approximately 240 million shekels (around £50 million) in damages, alleging that the media group used illegal methods such as phone hacking, bribery, and device hacking to obtain private information for 55 articles published between 1997 and 2015.

The court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to prove that the information was obtained unlawfully. The judge emphasized that private information alone does not automatically imply illegal acquisition, noting that there are legitimate ways to obtain such data, including from social circles or official sources. The plaintiffs were found to rely too heavily on speculation rather than solid evidence.

The media group hailed the ruling as a "resounding victory" for press freedom, stating that the reputations of their diligent journalists had been unjustly tarnished and are now cleared. The judgment may leave the plaintiffs responsible for substantial legal costs, potentially amounting to the full value of the claim, approximately 240 million shekels. This decision concludes a four-year legal battle marked by serious allegations of illegal surveillance and corruption.

Read the original at Now 14
Full coverage · 5 outlets
60% centerFirst: Now 14 · Jul 7

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Center 3Right 2
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

פתיחת המסוף החי