Compare full coverage across 6 outlets
Security07:54 · 1h ago

Prince Harry Condemns Court Ruling in Privacy Lawsuit Against Daily Mail Publisher

YnetCenter
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
The story · English

Prince Harry lost a privacy lawsuit against the publisher of the Daily Mail on Tuesday, with Judge Matthew Nicklin ruling that the plaintiffs failed to prove the published information was obtained illegally. The judge emphasized that suspicion alone was insufficient to establish wrongdoing, rejecting claims that the private information must have been acquired unlawfully simply because the publisher could not definitively explain how it was obtained.

Hours after the verdict, Harry and co-plaintiff Baroness Doreen Lawrence issued a joint statement expressing disappointment. They criticized the ruling as a "complete and clear cover-up," lamenting the court's dismissal of previous successful cases against News Group Newspapers and Mirror Group Newspapers involving illegal phone hacking. They highlighted inconsistencies in the court's approach and questioned how justice could be served when evidence suggesting misconduct was overlooked.

Harry and Lawrence pointed to recorded admissions by private investigators hired by the Daily Mail who deceitfully obtained information, as well as journalists who documented the investigators’ methods to access sensitive medical data and personal details, including flight information of a woman who had merely visited her partner. Harry appeared to reference his former partner Chelsea Davy in this context, noting that the media infringed on their privacy between 2004 and 2010.

The plaintiffs, including six others such as Sir Elton John, failed to prove that the publisher used illegal means like private investigators, impersonation, phone hacking, or bribery to gather private information. The legal battle coincided with Buckingham Palace rescinding an invitation for Harry to stay at the palace, officially citing his late response as the reason. However, sources suggest concerns about the lawsuit’s outcome and Harry’s reaction, which could affect the King’s required neutrality, influenced the decision.

Harry and Lawrence thanked their legal team and witnesses for their efforts in the pursuit of justice, despite the unfavorable ruling.

Read the original at Ynet
Full coverage · 5 outlets
60% centerFirst: Now 14 · 19h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Center 3Right 2
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the live terminal