Security16:00 · 3h ago

US Defense Chief Testifies on $87 Billion Budget Request to Fund Iran Conflict

Globes
Translated & summarized from Globes by baba
The story · English

US Secretary of Defense Pete Gosseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Kane testified before the Senate regarding the Trump administration's request for an $87 billion supplemental budget. The funds aim primarily to support ongoing military operations against Iran, including $67 billion allocated for defense spending. Lawmakers from both parties are expected to scrutinize the costs, long-term strategy, and intended use of the funds amid concerns over dwindling US missile defense stockpiles against Iranian attacks.

Ahead of the public hearing, Gosseth plans a classified briefing for Congress members to detail operational developments and urgent Pentagon needs. The debate also touches on the president's authority to continue military actions without explicit congressional approval, a contentious legal issue given the 1973 War Powers Act. The Trump administration argues that a new 60-day clock started with the recent resumption of hostilities, while opponents dispute this interpretation.

The budget request, submitted in late June, has met resistance from Democrats whose votes are crucial for approval. Estimates of the war's cost vary widely, with White House budget director Russ Vot previously citing $30 billion, while Senator Elissa Slotkin estimates nearly $98 billion spent so far. Security expert Professor Kobi Michael notes the geopolitical stakes for the US and Israel, warning that failure to secure funding could leave Israel isolated against a more aggressive Iranian threat.

The political context is sensitive, with Democratic primaries favoring anti-war candidates, reducing support for continued funding. Recent US military strikes in Iran and Iranian retaliatory attacks in the Gulf have escalated tensions. The Pentagon reported nearly 100 US troops injured since early July, most of whom have returned to active duty. Gosseth represents a hawkish faction within the Trump administration, advocating for a decisive American victory, contrasting with more dovish voices and widespread Democratic opposition to the conflict.

The outcome of the budget approval will significantly impact US military capabilities and strategy in the region, with potential legal battles over presidential war powers looming if Congress denies funding. This debate underscores the broader challenges facing US policy on Iran amid escalating hostilities and domestic political divisions.

Read the original at Globes
Open the live terminal