National Security Minister Ben Gvir and Police Chief Agree on Advisor Appointment Amid Controversy
A major controversy erupted within the Israeli police leadership after i24NEWS reported a purported agreement between National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and the incoming police chief, Commissioner Danny Levi, regarding the appointment of Levi's advisor. According to the report, Ben Gvir conditioned Levi's appointment on prior approval of the advisor's identity, described as the "advisor on Ben Gvir's matters," raising concerns about the police chief's independence and ability to make professional decisions free from political influence.
Senior police officials expressed serious apprehension, describing the advisor as effectively a political overseer appointed by the minister rather than a loyal aide to the police chief. One senior source said, "This is not an advisor to the police chief, but a kosher supervisor on behalf of the minister," warning that such an appointment could politicize the police and undermine objective decision-making.
The advisor expected to be appointed is Lior Abudraham, who strongly denied the allegations, stating that the police chief personally chose him and that claims of a deal are "absurd." The office of Minister Ben Gvir also rejected the notion of any deal, emphasizing that while the minister can recommend appointments, the final approval rests with him.
The Israeli Police issued a statement affirming that all appointments related to Commissioner Levi have been conducted professionally and responsibly, rejecting claims of improper arrangements. This controversy adds to ongoing tensions between Ben Gvir and the police, including recent criticism from the State Attorney over the minister's public comments on police conduct during a Haredi protest in Bnei Brak.
Legal authorities have noted persistent gaps regarding police independence and adherence to court rulings in dealings with Ben Gvir. It remains to be seen how this revelation will affect the formal approval process for Levi's appointment and whether judicial or public bodies will intervene.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.