Former Shin Bet Official Defends Chief David Zini Amid Controversy Over Loyalty Remarks

A former senior Shin Bet official, Adi Carmi, has defended current Shin Bet chief David Zini following a controversial statement that sparked internal uproar. Carmi argued that Zini chose an inappropriate word when discussing the agency's relationship with the political leadership, emphasizing that the real issue is restoring trust between Shin Bet and the government.

Carmi explained that Zini’s use of the term "loyalty" was problematic and suggested replacing it with "trust." He noted that Zini took office after a severe breakdown in communication and trust between the Shin Bet and the Prime Minister’s office, highlighting the necessity of a functional dialogue between the agency head and the Prime Minister. Carmi praised the Shin Bet’s operational effectiveness and leadership, stating he trusts the agency 99% and that it works closely with the military.

Addressing criticism of Zini’s character and intentions, Carmi insisted there is no basis for claims that Zini seeks to downplay the events of October 7. He described Zini as a patriotic and professional figure who rose to the rank of IDF general on merit. Carmi also touched on the controversy surrounding the memorial for the October 7 victims, explaining that Zini’s stance aimed at equal commemoration for all fallen Shin Bet members, not diminishing the memory of those killed in the recent attack.

Carmi stressed that the Shin Bet chief is organizationally subordinate to the Prime Minister but must maintain professional independence and uphold the law and agency regulations. He concluded that Zini’s goal is to rebuild trust and ensure proper working relations with the political echelon, rejecting accusations that he is trying to erase the memory of the October 7 tragedy.