Shin Bet Chief Zini Admits Political Agenda, Defends Loyalty to Elected Officials
Shin Bet chief David Zini acknowledged in a recent event that he accepted his appointment because he has a specific agenda he wants to advance. He stated that his loyalty to the political leadership was a key factor in his selection for the role. "I have worldviews I want to promote, it is my responsibility and my role," Zini said in recordings published by i24 on Tuesday evening.
Zini explained that despite his previous opposition to appointments bypassing the ranks, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu personally asked him to become Shin Bet head. Zini initially questioned why others more qualified were not chosen but ultimately accepted the task, emphasizing his absolute loyalty to the elected leadership regardless of political affiliation. When the audience applauded, he stopped them, saying such reactions were trivial given the current situation.
During the event, Zini criticized government officials and civil servants, claiming the elected leadership lacks the ability to manage their responsibilities effectively, leading him to focus on "damage control on the ground." He illustrated bureaucratic delays, noting that ministerial directives can take eight months to implement.
Zini also strongly condemned the judiciary and lawyers, dismissing the emphasis on human rights in legal proceedings as "nonsense." He accused many lawyers of harming human rights, economic growth, and national security through excessive procedures and protocols. He urged common sense to prevail, describing lawyers and legal experts as mere tools.
The remarks sparked swift backlash from Democratic Party chairman Yair Golan, who called Zini's admission one of the most dangerous statements ever from a security chief. Golan warned that entering the role with a political agenda and serving the government rather than the state poses a threat to national security.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.