US Envoy Details Hostage Deal Negotiations, Hamas Tactics, and Trump's Role
Translated & summarized from Maariv by baba
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Hamas demanded return to pre-Oct 7 status quo for hostages.
- Public disputes over Rafah harmed hostage deal talks.
- US envoy credited Trump with an effective, albeit unclear, threat.
- Israel will not allow threats to gather on its borders again.
- Hamas sought to remain in power as part of a deal.
A senior US official involved in the hostage deal negotiations has revealed behind-the-scenes details, including Hamas's consistent demand to return to the pre-October 7th status quo and remain in power in exchange for hostages. The official, Brett McGurk, described Hamas's base demand as "you can have the hostages, in exchange for all the Palestinian prisoners and so that we remain in power." McGurk stated that Hamas's core demand was to "return to the status quo of October 6th."
McGurk also explained that public disputes, particularly regarding Rafah, negatively impacted the hostage negotiations. He noted that Hamas leader Sinwar consumed media and that a perceived rift between the US and Israel, which he and Iran desired, would only encourage Hamas to harden its stance. He dismissed the idea that drastic cuts to military aid would have stopped the war, asserting that Israel's large arms industry would have allowed it to continue fighting.
Regarding the effectiveness of former President Donald Trump's actions, McGurk credited him and Steve Witkoff for a "highly effective" but unclear threat that helped secure the deal. He stated, "No one really knew what it meant, but it was highly effective." McGurk emphasized that without their unified effort, a divided Washington would have failed to achieve the agreement.
Concluding his remarks, McGurk conveyed a strong message to future US administrations about Israel's security perception post-October 7th. He asserted that Israel would no longer allow threats to gather on its borders and that any Israeli Prime Minister would act to protect their people if the US president advised against it, calling this a "vital basis for their existence."
Mentioned