New World Map Challenges Perceptions of Size and Geopolitics
Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- A new Equal Earth map corrects size distortions of the traditional Mercator projection.
- The Mercator map inaccurately depicts Greenland as larger than Africa.
- African nations advocated for the new map, citing misrepresentation.
- The US opposed the map change, calling it an ideological waste.
- Accurate flat representation of a spherical Earth remains a challenge.
A new world map projection, developed by Equal Earth, aims to more accurately represent the relative sizes of continents and countries, challenging the widely used Mercator projection. Professor Gideon Biger from Tel Aviv University's Geography Department explained that the familiar Mercator map, created for navigation before modern tools, distorts the true sizes of landmasses. For instance, Greenland appears larger than Africa on the Mercator map, despite being only about 10% of Africa's size. Similarly, regions closer to the poles, like Russia and Canada, are depicted as disproportionately larger than they are.
The initiative for a new map was led by African nations, who argued that their continent appeared smaller on traditional maps, leading to less consideration. The distortion arises from the challenge of accurately representing a spherical Earth on a flat surface. The Mercator projection, by treating the Earth as a cylinder, preserves shapes and directions but sacrifices accurate area representation. The new Equal Earth map, while improving the depiction of continental and country sizes, introduces other distortions concerning directions and distances between nations.
The United States reportedly opposed the change, viewing it as a waste of time and energy on an ideological issue rather than addressing pressing global problems. The article also briefly mentions a separate podcast episode on Israel's efforts to reduce cash usage.
Read the original at Ynet