Israeli Commentary Decries "Betrayal Campaign" Targeting Netanyahu and Supporters
Translated & summarized from Now 14 by baba
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Campaign shifts focus from accountability to labeling Netanyahu and supporters as traitors.
- Analysis warns against using October 7th failures for dangerous political smearing.
- All leaders before October 7th bear responsibility, requiring impartial investigation.
- Claims about Netanyahu's advance warning are presented as indictment, not inquiry.
- The campaign aims to delegitimize millions of Israelis, weakening national cohesion.
A recent analysis argues that the "Early Warning Campaign" concerning the October 7th failures has shifted from seeking accountability to a political effort to brand Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his supporters as traitors. The campaign, it contends, aims to transform Netanyahu from a leader requiring answers into one accused of "betrayal," and his millions of supporters into those suspected of complicity.
As elections approach, the article asserts that the focus on responsibility is giving way to dangerous political smearing. The "Early Warning Campaign" is no longer viewed as a political debate or a legitimate demand for inquiry into the October 7th failures, but rather a deliberate attempt to create a public verdict, making Netanyahu a persecuted figure and branding him and his supporters with the gravest possible stigma: treason.
The piece acknowledges that all national and security leaders serving before October 7th bear some responsibility for the "most severe failure in the country's history." It calls for a deep, independent, and impartial investigation into the political echelon, the Prime Minister, government ministers, and the heads of the IDF, Military Intelligence, Shin Bet, and Mossad. However, it criticizes the current approach, which it describes as "ugly and malicious politics" and "propaganda of betrayal and incitement to violence."
The article specifically addresses claims that Netanyahu received advance warning of a Hamas attack from Arab leaders, arguing these are presented not as questions for investigation but as a closed indictment. It criticizes the framing that implies Netanyahu knew and deliberately ignored the threat, stating that such claims ignore the complexities of real-time decision-making, the ambiguity of intelligence, and the need to weigh information from various sources, including security chiefs.
The author contends that the campaign's goal is not merely to oust the Prime Minister but to dehumanize him and his supporters, labeling them as traitors and morally suspect. This, the article warns, is a dangerous form of incitement that fractures national cohesion by designating millions of Israelis, particularly right-wing voters, as internal enemies. The analysis concludes that such tactics weaken Israel internally and that those who seek to delegitimize an entire segment of the population are not strengthening the nation.
Read the original at Now 14