Netanyahu Criticizes Rival Gantz's English Skills and Leadership
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in an extensive interview with the Makor Rishon newspaper ahead of upcoming elections, outlined the right-wing bloc's strategy and discussed recent events. He directly criticized former IDF Chief of Staff and political rival Benny Gantz, questioning his ability to lead on the international stage due to perceived difficulties with English proficiency and expressing ideas.
Netanyahu stated that Hamas has been significantly weakened in Gaza, asserting it no longer poses a "real threat" to Israel. However, he cautioned about potential provocations, including rocket or drone attacks, especially on the eve of elections, aimed at disrupting the electoral process.
Addressing the northern front, Netanyahu explained his decision not to inform the United States in advance of the operation to assassinate Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. He argued that prior notification would have alerted Nasrallah, allowing him to escape and the news to leak to the American press.
Emphasizing the importance of international experience and communication skills for an Israeli leader, particularly regarding Iran's nuclear program and addressing forums like the UN and Congress in English, Netanyahu directly addressed claims about Gantz's English. He stated, "This is certainly a problem for someone who wants to be Prime Minister of Israel, because he must be a leading figure on the world stage." Netanyahu also criticized Gantz's general capabilities, describing him as someone who "finds it difficult to express his ideas in general" and whose "style has always been to evade major decisions."
These remarks coincide with recent diplomatic events, including discussions at the UN General Assembly concerning the Gaza war, the humanitarian situation, and the prospect of a Palestinian state, with criticisms of Israel linked to the October 7th Hamas attacks.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.