Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories (in the app)
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the monthly limit

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Live Terminal

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories (in the app)
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the monthly limit

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Culture08:44 · 21m ago

The Slippery Slope: How Subtle Compromises Erode Principles

By עו"ד רוני פאלוך
Translated & summarized from Behadrei Haredim by baba
The story · English

The article explores the gradual erosion of principles through seemingly minor compromises, using the Hebrew concept of a "red line" that shifts over time. The author, identifying as a "simple" Jew, discusses how the "evil inclination" subtly encourages individuals to deviate from their values, not through drastic changes, but through incremental steps.

This phenomenon is illustrated through conversations with two friends. One, a senior figure with academic credentials, discusses the challenges of "integration" into secular society, where good intentions can lead to unintended compromises. He recounts an experience in a university cafeteria where he initially avoided a salad due to concerns about its kashrut (dietary laws), but later questioned, "What could possibly be in a cucumber and tomato salad?" This shift in questioning, from "Does this meet my standards?" to "What's the harm?" signifies a dangerous slide.

The author further elaborates with an anecdote from Rabbi M.K. about a dairy restaurant in Bat Yam with a non-stringent kashrut certificate. A patron ordered ravioli, assuming it was purely dairy and safe, especially since the ingredients like cheese and dough were reportedly kosher. However, the chef added a meat-based soup powder, inadvertently making the dish non-kosher when combined with dairy. The patron, unaware of the kitchen's actions, saw only a harmless dairy dish, highlighting how hidden issues can arise in seemingly simple situations.

Finally, the author recounts a personal experience in Ramat Gan at a non-stringent kosher establishment. While ordering a simple sandwich, he inquired about the presence of both meat and dairy items. The seller reassured him that everything was prepared separately. However, when another customer requested Bulgarian cheese for a chicken salad, the author witnessed firsthand the "What could possibly be in it?" mentality in action, leading to a potential violation of dietary laws. The author concludes this is not a theoretical question but a present reality, serving as a wake-up call.

Read the original at Behadrei Haredim
Open the live terminal